All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
It has been mentioned in the statement that the companies tend to hire consultant services so that the employees would work more efficiently. I strongly agree to the consideration that companies should listen to their employees, then these services would be unnecessary. The vital information here is that company wants to afflict the performance of the company which is solely dependent upon the employees of the company. Employees know all the pros and cons of working environment of the company, therefore company should try the measures due to which voices of the employees could be heard easily.
Firstly I would suggest here that the money which would be spent on the consultant services should be spent on hearing ideas from the employees because they go through that environment everyday. If something would be affecting their productivity then they could easily come up with the ideas so that the performance of the company will be escalated. If they would do so then the money generated by the company will mount and so it will bring positive effect into their salaries also.
Moreover, the consultant service that would be hired by the company will not be having any personal experience of the office association or environment compared to the employees. The consultants might be having prior information regarding what changes are to be made in the association but that would be a generalization of what had been implemented in other companies too. Hence, there would be no exotic predilection in the company comparing to others.
There are many big organizations in which personal services are provided to the employees that has drastically increased the performances of the employees rather than decreasing. For example crutches should be there for the employees who are parents, gyms should be built for fitness enthusiasts, companies like yahoo has slides along with stairs so that the mood of the people can be freshen up. Any personal differences through which people are going through would not be deciphered through the consultant services if they are hired.
Lastly I would like to finish my argument here by stating that If the company wants to dedicatedly increase the efficiency of the employees then they should ask employees rather than spending alot in consultant services that may or may not guarantee the bent the company requires.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ecause they go through that environment everyday. If something would be affecting their ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 479, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ing positive effect into their salaries also. Moreover, the consultant service tha...
^^^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...tches should be there for the employees who are parents, gyms should be built for fitne...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14805194805 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84548507159 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462337662338 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.712778993 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.571428571 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383488615743 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157876947654 0.0831039109588 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593482154884 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23518550366 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061655203829 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.