An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Doctors spend most of their lifetime in saving the lives of other people whom they might have never met and would not meet certainly after they become well. But whenever a patient is in need of a doctor, they will make sure that they do their best to save the life of the patient. By providing ailing patients the access to the doctors's record of treating similarly affected patients can have its both pros and cons. Therefore, the essay is not in complete support of the statement that through such easy access, the ailing patient may determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Firsly, the ailing patient's condition should not be this much dreadful that they would not be able to find the crux of the doctor's record. Moreover, diseases like cancer, heart surgeries, accidents are not the kind in which the patient would be able to do anything. At that particular point of time the presense of doctor is more than enough for them. Hence, allowing access to doctor's record history of treatment whould not be appropriate at all conditions.
Secondly, the privacy of the record history of treatment would be sabotaged completely as the evidences can be used against doctors also. It may happen that some people take the roads of sophistry to become the patient to have the access of records for the sole purpose of taking revenge against the doctors. Henceforth, the health department would have to become more attentive in order to apply the issue into the system, even then there is no guarantee of the safety of the records.
Thirdly, by giving access to the prior treatments the fees of the doctors would definitely increase that will have the direct affect on the billings of the patient. Also, there may come times when the patient might not be able to understand the technicalities of the terms and indulge herself/himself with the records so much that the condition of the patient might worsen. Therefore, certain time limit should be applied if this comes into practice otherwise the life of patient can be caught in danger.
Although the issue might have several drawbacks it also comes with the advantages with constraints that if the patient have time they will have the satisfcation that there treatment is being done by a viable doctor. But the implemention of this issue might take years to get perfection or might fail which would be a complete waste of time and money. Hence, in my opinion access of doctor's records should not be given to the patients.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ng similarly affected patients can have its both pros and cons. Therefore, the essa...
^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e evidences can be used against doctors also. It may happen that some people take th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 127, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...tely increase that will have the direct affect on the billings of the patient. Also, ther...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83720930233 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47949296096 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481395348837 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.257822383 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.352941176 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2941176471 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392615277217 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146178741339 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126416452055 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234143408621 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119390230502 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.