All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
In my opinion, The statements given above are not exact. I disagree with the statements. As the assumption that consultants would become unnecessary is to extreme. Further, I explained why i disagree with these statements.
Firstly, Companies are hiring outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more effciently which is the one way to increase revanue. Why companies should hire outside consultants? Well, There is the huge difference between the point of view of companies employess and outside consultants. The reason behind this is outside consultant has more exposure of market, consumer side, idea about different stratigies which other companies has been applying and on the other hand normal employ thinks keeping the various factors in consideration like they prefer thei own department, and find faults in other departments. Personal grudges and even they generally had lack of market, consumer side, and other companies stratgies knowledge. For Example, Consider the example of indian Mobile manufecturing company Micromax this company was on the top in 2014 but after this this company focuses only on profit and did not invest anything in Research and Development. This company went into bottom of the list in just few year as New brand enters with customer centric and more efficient mobile phones. Now, Where outside consultant perform their role is, In giving specific direction and points where company should improve like If Micromax at that time when new brands entered in the market focused on less profit and value for money product and invested some money in Research and development then may be The Company would be still on the top. And even if they listened to their employees they would be still on bottom as normally there is higher chances that their employees would have been also showed propensity toward profit rather than any other thing as it is general tendency.
Secondly, As this kind of outside consultants have explored more they can give better reasons and even can think more logically as they have more data of failure and success of specific stratigies with proper reasons. An Everyone has to accept that in normal cases more data you have means more their is chances that your decision will be right if you know how to use it.
On the other hand, If we consider internal problems, departmental problems, machinary problems these kind of problems could be better understand and solved by employees. Outside consultant can solve it but not as accurate as employees.
To conslude this I would say that every coin has two sides so it has too. But we have to decide which one is benificial so I disagree with the statement as listening to own employees never make outside consultant unnecessary. Even it will make consultant necessary to reach the effective solution as at that time company has to consider employees side and market side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... exact. I disagree with the statements. As the assumption that consultants would b...
^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: TO_TOO[4]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...consultants would become unnecessary is to extreme. Further, I explained why i dis...
^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...is to extreme. Further, I explained why i disagree with these statements. Fir...
^
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...ompany was on the top in 2014 but after this this company focuses only on profit and did ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1027, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'few years'.
Suggestion: few years
...ny went into bottom of the list in just few year as New brand enters with customer centr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1543, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are higher chances'?
Suggestion: there are higher chances
...ey would be still on bottom as normally there is higher chances that their employees would have been al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'An' or 'Everyone'?
Suggestion: An; Everyone
...pecific stratigies with proper reasons. An Everyone has to accept that in normal cases more...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...mal cases more data you have means more their is chances that your decision will be r...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...partmental problems, machinary problems these kind of problems could be better understand ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, as to, for example, kind of, you know, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09205020921 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62614221974 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512552301255 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.4824259604 60.3974514979 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.7 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439148501934 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129142900595 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105315377707 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181698125815 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131845636669 0.0667264976115 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.