All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
I believe that hiring consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently is always a better idea than to just rely on feedback from employees.
It is a well-known fact in business that employees of a company fall easily for peer pressure. Most of the employees are not well aware that how a decision X will impact the company overall and their work specifically. They tend to go according to what other people are thinking and try to "fit-in" to the culture of the company.
Moreover, there can be many employees who would be quite knowledgable about the effects of actions that the company intends to take or has taken yet they wouldn't just "care" enough to speak out until and unless it impacts them directly and severely. This does not mean they are not good employees, it just shows that they value their time and after all, it's not their "business" to indulge in every decision because they have got their own job to do as well.
Third, "groupthink" is a term which means easily agreeing to the decisions made by your boss or by what majority of people in the team think is "correct" even though they can see the fallacies in the plan. This is commonly observed at workplaces, and even though it is discouraged doesn't mean it's completely eliminated because there will always be employees who want to "look" good by being pliant and there will always be seniors suppressing their juniors.
For these reasons above, I think that listening to employees is not entirely "reliable". It would be way more beneficial for an enterprise to hire the professionals whose job is to analyze the company's efficiency, bring out the fallacies and suggest changes along with devising schemes to bring out more productivity.
But does this mean listening to employees can be ignored? Listening to employees is very crucial, for they can provide great insights to work culture which eventually determines success. As mentioned before, groupthink should be discouraged. However, the information gained from employees should not be the only source of information to make important decisions. Hiring consultants will always provide greater efficacy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...y intends to take or has taken yet they wouldnt just 'care' enough to speak o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...at they value their time and after all, its not their 'business' to indul...
^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...aces, and even though it is discouraged doesnt mean its completely eliminated because ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, third, well, after all, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20221606648 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29997013189 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548476454294 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2352596838 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.2 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275056925493 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101093718683 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837837923932 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169799884351 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933778804463 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.