All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
Today`s world ventured by giant companies and their products in our day to day life. To protect the compatibility and market credibility many companies hired an expert who can help them to acheive their company goal and their competition in the market. The expert hand`s opinion help them to find out the technical mistake, to grab the attention of the customer for their new launched product. Such as during October 21.2021 Facebook has launched its Metabook version. They hired a campaign consultant who helped them to set up strategy and new marketing policy among the Facebook users. Today`s world nothing is free. You have to pay for every product. When the product is free, you become the product yourself. The consultant or any expert make the fine tuning of the company`s operation more effectively and efficiently.
For the last decades it becomes a trend to hire a consultant by the big companies. If you have the vision to make a difference in the market policy or making profit by selling your product, a consultant can help you manage those. Though the cost of pursuing a consultant for a company can cost a fortune. But big companies are always up to for the profit like apples, Samsung Etc. The Giant tech companies are always positive about employee’s satisfaction. This strategy could help the company to achieve their goal more successfully. Because employees know the faults of the system because they are the part of the system.
Moreover a democratic way of discussion sessions like meetings, seminars or close door cabinets could find a solution of the system`s fault. Also those sessions can invoke a critical thinking ability among the employees. Ultimately it will benefit a company in the long run. Because these abilities will encourage them to use their skills to make a profit as well as increasing their problem solving abilities. Overall a consultant for a company will be unnecessary.
However a consultant can act as a third principal of a company or non-biased body who can point out towards the problem rather than employees. In this case every company should create a platform where the employees can give their opinion unbiasedly with joint venture of a consultant. In conclusion, safe workplace and open discussion forum are needed to build the rapport between the company management and the employees.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
... market. The expert hand's opinion help them to find out the technical mistake, to grab the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ause they are the part of the system. Moreover a democratic way of discussion sessions...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... a solution of the system's fault. Also those sessions can invoke a critical th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tant for a company will be unnecessary. However a consultant can act as a third ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t for a company will be unnecessary. However a consultant can act as a third princip...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, third, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10025706941 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84768862344 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52442159383 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5907795191 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2083333333 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311395879133 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919960365191 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066371574373 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192622035896 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446610010638 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
... market. The expert hand's opinion help them to find out the technical mistake, to grab the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ause they are the part of the system. Moreover a democratic way of discussion sessions...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... a solution of the system's fault. Also those sessions can invoke a critical th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tant for a company will be unnecessary. However a consultant can act as a third ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t for a company will be unnecessary. However a consultant can act as a third princip...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, third, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10025706941 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84768862344 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52442159383 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5907795191 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2083333333 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311395879133 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919960365191 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066371574373 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192622035896 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446610010638 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.