All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The given statements suggest that companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficaciously. Rather if they were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. This is a completely plausible approach for dealing with the the employer-employee equation and I absolutely agree with the suggestion provided.
Companies are built by the people who work for it. They have greater idea about the work culture and environment. They are full cognizant of its rules, regulations and canons that delineate the company's guidelines for its staff. An outsider, such as a consultant would not be fully abreast and aware of the minutiae of the company and may not be able to cater to its needs in the best possible way.
The consultant might be a virtuoso when it comes to his/her skills and may even possess plethora of information and knowledge. However, he/she is still incapable of understanding the gears that run the company and the several arrangements made within the office and the reasons behind why most of the stuff works, the way it does. So any suggestions offered by the pundit of organizational efficiency, may not be easily accepted by the people working over there because firstly, they might have their qualms about an outsider evaluating and suggesting them. Secondly, there might be mental impediments of accepting and functioning in a way to suit a person with whom they are not yet accustomed. Hence, the salubrious intention behind employing a consultant might not get translated in reality.
Instead, as suggested the company can always have people of the organisation itself devoted to redress and attend to employees' grievances. This will not only improve the relationship between the hierarchy of the organisation but also ameliorate the minor scuffles between those involved. Another boon of such a measure is that it will circumscribe matters pertinent to the company and abstain from involving outsiders or divulging information to those outside the organisation.
Nevertheless, a different mindset would suggest that a consultant is someone who is not associated with the company and hence the suggestions provided by such an individual would not be biased or prejudiced in any possible way. Its said that an outsider has a more disinterested or neutral view which can be a probable explanation of why his/her presence must seem vital. In addition the staff employed to address the employees concerns about the company might have some reservations or prejudice, thus preventing an impartial outcome. This will not only prove to be stymie to the company's growth but also affect the various relationships present in the company.
Hence, both outlooks have their own pros and cons. In the end, its up to the company to decide and accept what works best for it. By experimenting and finding empirical evidence it can eventually bring about the right changes and establish the perfect, balanced methodology that helps maintain peace at the workplace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... company to operate more efficaciously. Rather if they were to spend more time listeni...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ely plausible approach for dealing with the the employer-employee equation and I absolu...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ely plausible approach for dealing with the the employer-employee equation and I absolu...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to its needs in the best possible way. The consultant might be a virtuoso when ...
^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...hy his/her presence must seem vital. In addition the staff employed to address the emplo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 64, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ve their own pros and cons. In the end, its up to the company to decide and accept ...
^^^
Line 11, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... helps maintain peace at the workplace.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2572.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22764227642 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9869419693 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 799.2 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8791100546 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.909090909 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395946792983 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114659403339 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121830870486 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215387769702 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15017469245 0.0667264976115 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.