Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Equality among the men and women, the yin and yang that constitute human population has always been considered as a part of a long-running, contentious debate. They are physically different but should we give so much of importance to the physical aspects as to differentiate their roles completely and demarcate a boundary separating the tasks performed by each gender? The given statement sheds light on this and I chose to disagree with it.
There are myriad historical instances which show that there always existed a boundary. Women were thought of as the child bearers and home makers. Public sphere eluded them in a professional sense. Men were the breadwinners and earned money. Women who worked were looked down upon and shunned. They were ridiculed and thought of as potential competitors and threat in the male patriarchal society. Even though this prejudice was rampant, it did not succeed in deterring the female hope and women continued to handle challenging jobs and simultaneously ignoring the disparaging remarks that were showered upon them along the way.
Today, in the 21st century we can definitely say the situation is much better. Job roles are diverse and more accepting and the bias based on gender has reduced to a great extent, but it is not completely eliminated. It still exists but in a way which is not so revealing. Women working in male-dominated jobs and functioning everyday in an environment commonly associated with men, have agreed on seeing an underlying sense of discrimination. It is as if the society wants to seem accepting, but they have themselves not been capable enough to expand their horizon and augment their thinking, to accept women performing all roles and sharing responsibilities, shoulder to shoulder with the men.
From mechanics to astronauts, from doctors to pilots, from scientists to CEOs the world has been witness to several powerful, inspiring and eminent women who have shown us that growth is possible, if we have the desire to flourish. They have proved that no bias or prejudice can stop a woman from achieving what she wants if she has the will for it. An ignorant person might counter and raise a question that child-bearing is still a women's job and cannot be accomplished by a man. To disprove that I would say, science has advanced and there are medical geniuses who have made it possible for men to carry a child.
Hence, there never was a job exclusive for men or exclusive for women. We can find examples in mythology and history which suggest that neither God nor man could ever suggest which tasks must be done by which gender. The capabilities bestowed are equal, and so are skills and strength. So, if there is anything that needs to change is the mindset or mentality of people and the masses in general to accept. In fact, it should never matter who is doing the work as long as the work is being done perfectly. It should never be a question of which gender performed it. It may sound nonsensical as a question but we all know few incidents when such a scenario was in front of us.
Let us start respecting people for what they do rather than what they are. Let us build a society that eliminates bias or prejudice on anything as stupid as gender. Let us start believing in the women around us. Our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives and all womenfolk have always been capable to drive the society as equals with the men. It's not about feminism, it's about equality. We are not considering anyone superior, but we are not even demeaning someone. The day when this becomes a reality is the day when we can truly call ourselves successful in building a quality society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...has always been considered as a part of a long-running, contentious debate. They are physicall...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... in male-dominated jobs and functioning everyday in an environment commonly associated w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was never
... men to carry a child. Hence, there never was a job exclusive for men or exclusive fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 166, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...judice on anything as stupid as gender. Let us start believing in the women around ...
^^^
Line 11, column 192, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding women'?
Suggestion: the surrounding women
...id as gender. Let us start believing in the women around us. Our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 340, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ive the society as equals with the men. Its not about feminism, its about equality....
^^^
Line 11, column 364, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...s with the men. Its not about feminism, its about equality. We are not considering ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, so, still, as to, in fact, in general, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3038.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 628.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83757961783 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00598923014 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74311991802 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 320.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509554140127 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 949.5 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.6509944298 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0606060606 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0303030303 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.51515151515 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161347040126 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384197800249 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346425193838 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852463639621 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374366204845 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.