The issue considers whether companies should hire outside experts to help them work more efficiently, or whether they should listen to their own people because it is just a wast of ressources. I strongly disagree with the issue because outside consultants can be helpful in more than one way.
First of all, hiring these consultants help the companies think outside of the box. Only listening to their own employees will make the nature of the proposed solutions always the same, and thus, they will stay stuck if they couldn't solve it from the beginning. Hiring these people will provide the company with new points of view to those that they are already accustomed to, which will at the end help the company solve its efficiency problems and become more efficient.
Second, these consultants wouldn't be hired this much if they didn't prove themselves. While the company's employees spend the majority of their time executing the tasks given to them, the experts spend theirs working with different companies on solving their problems and making them more efficient. Some of them may even have some predefined "new" solutions which they spend their free time working on. Therefore, hiring them will not only make the company efficient, but also make it become so as fast as possible.
Finally, because these experts do not work at the ocmpany, they always have an objective point of view. The company's employees tend to have a subjective one when resolving their own efficiency problems because they are themselves inputs of these problems. And by minimizing their supposed impacts, they may not find the solution if the problem is in them and their way of doing things. That's why having a third eye from an outsider can always be helpful.
All in all, we've seen how companies hiring outside consultants to solve their efficiency problems are doing the right thing. These consultants present the company with a new way of thinking, are usually hired because they have already proven themseleves with other companies, and are objective in their way of dealing with the problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... and thus, they will stay stuck if they couldnt solve it from the beginning. Hiring the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...efficient. Second, these consultants wouldnt be hired this much if they didnt prove ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ants wouldnt be hired this much if they didnt prove themselves. While the companys em...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... in them and their way of doing things. Thats why having a third eye from an outsider...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
...r can always be helpful. All in all, weve seen how companies hiring outside consu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07225433526 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52779827288 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491329479769 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8260404111 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334491053719 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133119616827 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816418080383 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217713852926 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618161511822 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.