A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

The statement says that all of a nation's students must follow the same national curriculum until they enter college. I firmly disagree with this statement as i strongly believe that even though it would give the students the same chances and education accross the country, not everyone has the same abilities, and it won't allow students to study subjects that they love.

Some people may say that the statement is true, arguing that by doing so, all the students will have received the same education as they will enter college, and thus they will have the same chances of succeeding in the latter. This argument has some truth in it, but even though it gives the same chances to all the students, it stuffs them with some knowledge that they won't really need after they leave highschool. For example, we have all studied maths during our curriculum from elementary school to high school, but those of us who chose to pursue an Arts or Literature degree won't need the maths after highschool.

However, not all people are made equal. This means that not everyone has the same capacities, and therefore, while some succeed in the unified curriciulum, a lot of forgotten others don't, and by doing so, they are considered as lacking the competence and skills to succeed in college, and thus society. But if we instead chose to teach them or let them choose subjects that are relevant to their skills levels, this would motivate them and they can even improve after. As a popular idiom says: "You can't judge a fish by its ability to climb trees".

Last but not least, unifying the curriculum doesn't let people study subject that they truly like. This will result in some people getting bored and not enjoying what they are studying, and in some cases, not achieving their full potential and not attaining their full potential. This is reflected in the educational systems' ranking accross the world, where the ones that get the best rankings are the systems that gives some freedom to their students in choosing the subjects they like the most. An example to this is Finland which ranks in the top places of all the rankings, and where students are fully satisfied of their systems because it lets them choose the subjects they want to study, and their curriculum contains, in addition to the traditionally taught subjects, some subjects that are meants to help the students deal with life as they grow.

All in all, we have seen how requiring a country's students to follow the same curriculum nationwide is not the right idea, as even though it may give the same chances to all the students in that country, not every student has the same capacity, and by doing so, we refrain the students from choosing and studying subjects that they truly love. That is why i disagree with the recommendation.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an art' or simply 'Arts'?
Suggestion: an art; Arts
...ol, but those of us who chose to pursue an Arts or Literature degree wont need the math...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... curriciulum, a lot of forgotten others dont, and by doing so, they are considered a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ter. As a popular idiom says: 'You cant judge a fish by its ability to climb tr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... but not least, unifying the curriculum doesnt let people study subject that they trul...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 357, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...jects that they truly love. That is why i disagree with the recommendation.
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 33.0505617978 200% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81198347107 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4126667464 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442148760331 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.4151070343 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.266666667 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2666666667 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366996193132 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13116021014 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146076444487 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23254319427 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126637319415 0.0667264976115 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.