Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers

Many people nowadays interested in being an effective leader who wants to achieve a goal and encourages their group members to be motivated, but it is not easy to determine which aspect is more important to be a good leader. The cited sentence weighs a leader's ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers than sound moral judgment, however, it is more plausible to disagree with the author's claim.
Admittedly, the ability to listen to his or her peers is important to sustain and make a vibrant group. For example, if a leader does not listen to others' opinion which is opposed to the leader and refuse to reflect any suggestions which seem to reduce leader's position, members of that group will follow the leader's tendency, thus it will make the group strict and rigid to other's opinion. To be a vigorous group, listening to other’s opinions is essential for enhancing the ability of a group's problem-solving.
Therefore, it is largely agreeable with the claim that in most cases a leader's tact to maintain the respect of his or her peers is important. However, this agreement does not mean that sound moral judgment is less important than the ability of respect of members. The moral decision which is made by a leader influences not only on a decision but on the whole society. For example, Lee Man Hee, the religious leader of Sinchungee (a kind of emerging religion) justified lie to get redemption of God and to do be selected by God. He encouraged his followers to lie and betray their neighborhood and government thus it makes a chaotic result when members of Sinchungee are investigated for the spread of COVID-19. Like in this case, the leader's moral decision is crucial for the whole society member as well as members of the leader's group.
In addition, the moral judgment of a leader is important to get the support of people. For example, Hilary Clinton who was an eminent candidate of President of America, could not be elected because of her past lies and hypocritical attitude. Her husband, Bill Clinton who was a President of America, used to be received wide support but he collapsed due to his sex scandal with a young secretary. On the contrary, A. Lincoln's moral decision to emancipate all of slavery despite popular opposition of southerners promoted the principle of racial equality. Thus, sound moral judgment can also have an enormous effect on a whole society.
In conclusion, proper moral judgment and respect of members should be combined so that they can have a synergetic effect for being an effective, powerful, and pursuable leader.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ood leader. The cited sentence weighs a leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
..., members of that group will follow the leaders tendency, thus it will make the group s...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a group' or simply 'groups'?
Suggestion: a group; groups
... essential for enhancing the ability of a groups problem-solving. Therefore, it is lar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ble with the claim that in most cases a leaders tact to maintain the respect of his or ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in most cases, on the contrary, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74145931459 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479545454545 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9868947464 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433241415177 0.243740707755 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141397804487 0.0831039109588 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100033315257 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259521974843 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738317488914 0.0667264976115 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.