Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
There are many traits that a leader must have to properly carry out the duties required, including the ability to lead their peers while maintaining respect. However, while this is an important trait, this doesn't make it solely more important than the ability to use sound judgment.
When commanding a group of peers, it's advantageous to refer to one's own moral judgment. While the opinions and morality of those peers can falter and be replaced depending on a particular set of people, a leader having a firm sense of their own morality can bolster their confidence in the decisions that they make. Regardless of the feelings of those being led, the reasoning behind decisions will be based on the leader's own moral compass.
The confidence in decision-making that accompanies sound moral judgment may also be sensed by those being led, leading to a gain in their respect. The motives persuading someone whose morality bends with the majority surrounding them may be considered untrustworthy, as their actions are based not on their own beliefs, but of others who they hope to lead. If seen this way by their peers, the very trait they hoped would gain respect might lead to a feeling of distrust instead.
This is not to say that the respect of a leader's peers is unnecessary, but that it holds a similar place in importance to a sound moral judgment. Even with an incredibly steadfast morality, a complete lack of respect from peers would likely render a potential leader incapable of commanding the necessary presence. To best carry out the role of leadership, both holding sound moral judgment and maintaining the respect of peers should be traits that are personified.
While the respect of peers is an important issue, to say that its importance overrides that of a sound moral judgment is a statement that does not always hold true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... while this is an important trait, this doesnt make it solely more important than the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96474358974 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71219569837 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5409777586 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.083333333 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32504080323 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139285733603 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875613817808 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21446405558 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933213168027 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.