Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A leader is the person who not only leads a group of people, but he inspires them, trains them and brings out the better version of them, sometimes with words, or often by just being tacit. It is stated in the prompt that keeping the respect of his people uphold rather than judging them by their deeds is more important for a leader. Even though it is important to ensure justice and honesty in applying law and action against the wrong doers, I agree with the fact that a leader should be more sensible to keep the dignity of his followers and careful so that his people do not feel humiliated by him.
No one can become a leader by himself- he needs the support of a certain number of people, who believes in him, respects him and are very well aligned with his principles. These people follow him because he speaks for them, not just leads them from the front, but also resonates their thoughts and ideas. He lifts them up and helps them overcome their drawbacks, their struggles. So, obviously, they do not expect their leader to be judgmental to their deeds, instead, they want him to be supportive all the times. Even if they do something unethical or morally unacceptable, they expect their head-person to be tolerant, understanding and want him to look deeper for the motive behind his action rather than immediate action against their misdeeds.
A leader needs to be more focused on the motive of an action rather than the incident itself to find out what actually is playing the part to cause it. An imminent action may discourage others to do the same wrong thing, but it also fails to uproot the actual reason behind the unethical deed of his followers. Moreover, the humiliation and exposure of the followers often deteriorates their mental conditions and inspires them to go down the wrong path even more strongly. So a leader needs be subtle. Instead of reprimanding them harshly, he can send them a message with warning. Or he can express his disappointment towards them which will work as demotivator when they think of taking the wrong path again.
A leader's respect is also defined by the deeds of his followers action and achievement. Their great works, inventions or achievements is somehow credited to their leader's name as well. Similarly, any massive bad occurrence conducted by their action also gets entangled with the leaders name, making people question the person they follow. So, exposing the followers wrong doings can often bring disgrace for the leader's own name, even leading to his resignation and downfall.
To conclude, a leader needs to be diplomatic with all his actions and decisions. Even though 'doing the right thing' should not be compromised, but a leader needs to be more pragmatic and prescient. For greater good and a permanent reduction of misdeeds, a leader should give more importance to keep the dignity of his followers high, motivated and actions for wrong doings should be taken subtly without causing any harm to their reputation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...w and action against the wrong doers, I agree with the fact that a leader should be more sensible to kee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8440545809 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56229790254 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479532163743 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8413264684 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09523809524 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140007406831 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555874952274 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038106368364 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095240859741 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255180810252 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.