In any enterprise, the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product.
In a world, where customers expecting the absolute flawless results from enterprises, the final product has become so important that, the process by which the end product is made is not acredited at all. In these cases, it is vital to notice that the product is just the end result of the process, it is just a part of the process and the entire process need not be only focused on the end product. Following are the reasons for why the end product should not be given ample importance and also about what are the consequences if only importance is given to the end product and not the process.
Firstly, it is key to note that the process makes us learn more about what to do better and more efficiently. Whenever a product is made, if the enterprise is only focused on the end product, they might lose context of what they are trying to accomplish. If during the process, they go with any slap-dashed way of manufacturing the product because they only care about the end product, they will indeed receive temporary success just to reach the end goal of making it. Their number of sales might increase and the prices of the products could increase and they can end up with more profits. But in the long run, if the product is made in such a way that they make the customers dissatisfied by the poor quality of the product or the durability of the product is compromised because of the faulty process of manufacturing it, it is eventually the end of the enterprise. In my experience, the company in which I work in, manufactures products, in one release they hastily produced more products just to reach the goal sale numbers. This led to the customers not being satisfied with our products in the later time, and giving us bad reviews has damaged the good reputation of the company and leading to dissoluting a lot of sales because of this in the long run.
Secondly, if the companies only focus on the final product, they will not be able to make the process which they use to manufacture their goods any better. On the other hand, if they are willing to shed more light on the process each time they make a bunch of items, they can think more innovative ways of improving the process. This can lead to a better and efficient process by using which the enterprise can cut the costs, improve sales and also satisfy the customers. For example, there was a start-up company called Kotaka in a rural area of India. They could easily follow the leads of the monopolies of their field by making products without thinking about the methods by which they are made. Instead, they chose an unconventional way of producing products, they usually have a process after producing each batch of items, the board of directors of the firm and the employees have discussions on how to improve the process to make the product and also on how to make better products for the customers. They also take feedback from the consumers of the product and try to correct anything in their process if it is making them not satisfied. This has led this start-up to become a unicorn in just one year into the business which left the former monopolies in their space in awe.
In conclusion, it is important for the companies to note that not only the end product but also they process which they are following to make that product also plays a vital role in making the enterprise lead the market. If they try to ameliorate both the end product and the process hand-in-hand, they can definitely achieve not only their planned goals but also can make room for making unprecedented goals in favor of the company. This benefits not only the enterprise in a positive way, but also the customers who buy these products will be benefitted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... be able to make the process which they use to manufacture their goods any better. ...
^^^
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... This benefits not only the enterprise in a positive way, but also the customers who buy these p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 97.0 58.6224719101 165% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3043.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 663.0 442.535393258 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58974358974 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07432619952 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53465658091 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.387631975867 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 963.0 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7249564795 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.904761905 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296599812163 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116043436968 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624540052393 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212915651955 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00965082501179 0.0667264976115 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.