In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position:
Most organizations -political, educational, government- has a governing body to function properly. We can call this governing body as those who are in power because the organization is run by the rules and regulations put forth by them. As it is in the nature of human being to formulate rules with respect to owns personal ambitions - either consciously or subconsciously - it is imperative to have a swift change of power at regular interval to preclude too much personalization of the organization.
When in power it is the natural tendency of humans to run according to one's own vision. Before coming to power most individual would have a plan as to how improvement can be done in different sectors of the organization but. As they come to power they start implementing their envisions. After a certain time the implementations complete with successes and failures. And then gradually personal fulfillment and pleasure start to impact the subsequent decisions. The more time passes by, the more decisions gets parochial. They become more venal and starts making decisions which involve less on the future of the organization and more paving the way to remain in power and have personal gain. The prime example of these can be found in the monarchy system itself where almost all of the kings and queens indulged themselves in debauchery during their long reign.
But the most frightening consequence of perennial ruling is not during the start or middle of the reign. It is the retaliation of the rulers when their power is threatened. From the ancient times to present day we can see the brute way tyrants squelch their oppositions. Examples of which includes the Armenian genocide by the ottomans and the most recent Bashar Al Assad's menacing measures against the rebels without any form of caring about the civilians life. They become so desperate to hold the power that their morality becomes a lost cause.
That is not to say that long-term power doesn't have any benefits at all. With long reign, the organizations become more stable and the rulers have a better grip on the nuances of the internals. When there is a constant change of power, new rules might not share the same vision as the previous ones and for that reason, many of the projects started are abandoned in the middle. This type of intermittent abandoning leads to squandering of money and resources. In order to mitigate these a suitable time period has to be chosen and in my opinion 5 years is a good timeframe to implement most of the tasks undertaken.
So, In conclusion, transfer of power in a regular interval is cardinal so that those who are in power don't become corrupt and have the motivation that although short time power may give them impunity they will have to answer in the long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h personalization of the organization. When in power it is the natural tendency...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ersonalization of the organization. When in power it is the natural tendency of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ferent sectors of the organization but. As they come to power they start implement...
^^
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the monarchy system itself where almost all of the kings and queens indulged themselves in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n debauchery during their long reign. But the most frightening consequence of ...
^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'civilians'' or 'civilian's'?
Suggestion: civilians'; civilian's
...ls without any form of caring about the civilians life. They become so desperate to hold ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their morality becomes a lost cause. That is not to say that long-term power ...
^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...That is not to say that long-term power doesnt have any benefits at all. With long rei...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mplement most of the tasks undertaken. So, In conclusion, transfer of power in ...
^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cardinal so that those who are in power dont become corrupt and have the motivation ...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will have to answer in the long term.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, as to, in conclusion, in my opinion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89852008457 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80645555778 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530655391121 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6343936619 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.318181818 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.097478760681 0.243740707755 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0288678982489 0.0831039109588 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0217745806395 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592794960443 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118703835349 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.