There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It behooves us as human beings -leading species of planet earth- to save the species that are in precarious situation, mostly because of our unbridled invasion on their habitat. So, government should take every step necessary to redress this fault.
Most of the endangered species are at that position because of human intervention. With unrestrained hunting, poaching and cutting of trees for the valuable parts of the animal body, like the tooth of the African Elephant or the oil of the Blue Whale, these species rapidly decrease in number and become endangered. Not only hunting, but invasion of humans into the natural habitat also plays overarching role in making an animal species endangered. So it is only fair for us to take every step and precaution to preserve a species whose existence has been threatened by us. Moreover, in some places these species plays an important cultural and social role. For example the endangered Royal Bengal Tiger is the national animal of Bangladesh and also the symbol of the sports teams in Bangladesh. Therefore it is of primal importance for the Government of Bangladesh to take every step to thwart the decrease of tiger population.
Also, most of the time preservation of an endangered species is implemented through a no-hunting zone and wildlife sanctuaries. This type of steps not only preserves the endangered species but also bolster the survival of any species on the verge of becoming endangered. It provides a safe habitat for all the flora and fauna in that area.
Besides from the preservation perspective, wildlife sanctuaries and other measures to protect endangered species actually create jobs. It creates jobs for local population as guides, guards or monitors etc. As a result, projects for wildlife preservation plays an important role in diminishing jobless population. On top of that, endangered species is also a popular tourist attraction. When a species becomes endangered, its value increases and people from different areas of the world revel at the sight of the animal. So, while the statement suggests that protection of endangered species may incur a significant cost of money, if properly managed most of the money can be recompensated with the inflow of tourism money.
In conclusion, we should not take the protection of endangered species as a burden on our shoulder. Rather we should take this as a fair indemnification to the species and also a way to create more jobs in the respective areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...mbol of the sports teams in Bangladesh. Therefore it is of primal importance for the Gove...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ed species as a burden on our shoulder. Rather we should take this as a fair indemnifi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14074074074 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90204244071 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513580246914 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.19198421 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994836773382 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354030258664 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257260694987 0.0758088955206 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055551395248 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345819861612 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.