In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In any field, change in leadership can bring change in the whole environment. When should a leader step down from his or her power to give way to new leadership? Should leadership change with time? Or should it change only if the leader involved fail to lead? This is not a trivial matter. In my opinion, those in power should only be required to step down, if they are found incompetent, regardless of the time period they are in power. An experienced leader is almost always preferable and often, longer projects need stability in leadership.
While it is true that sometimes new leadership can engender results much more quickly by looking at things from different angles, an experienced leader knows the best in the corresponding field. This is why some countries in the world required a change in the Presidency after a fixed period of time. For example, in the United States, a single person cannot be the President for more than 8 years at stretch. But this policy would be a problem, if there is any long term project going on that would require more than 8 years. May be the new President will not be genial to the project as the last one and so, he or she may cancel the project altogether, resulting in a waste of money and time. This may happen especially, if there is disagreement between the previous and current incumbent. Similar scenarios are possible in every field of endeavors.
Experience is precious. So, if new leadership is required only after 5 years, it is a waste of the previous leader's experience. As a leader earn more experience, he or she can become more efficient in his or her job. A new leader will need a similar amount of time to gain the grasp of things like the previous leader. A policy that would require a change in leadership will result in at best an inefficient use of experience, assuming older leaders can again be elected, or at worst, an utter waste of precious experience. Such change can also disturb the morale of the followers. We can look at the company Apple. When Steve Jobs was forced to leave his own company, under new leadership the company faltered. But when he was brought back, the company stood back on its feet again. So, the policy in the prompt can severely lessen the effectiveness of leadership.
Long term projects need long dedication and an unchanging environment to succeed. But in a leadership system, where those in powers are required to step down after 5 years, such dedication and environment may hardly be found. Newer leaders may not see the value of the work of the previous leaders in the same way. They may cancel the whole project resulting in a waste of resources. Any successful long-term work needs steady leadership. We can look at the companies -- Google, Amazon, Microsoft, etc. All of these are successful companies, and were under constant leadership until their potentials were realized, while companies like Yahoo failed to reach their full potential because of such vacillation in leadership. Thus, to maintain steady progress for longer projects, the prompt's policy should not be implemented.
Experience is one of the most important attributes of a leader in any field. Frequent vacillation in power can result in ineffectiveness at best and waste at worst. So, those in power should not be required to step down based on the time period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... change in the Presidency after a fixed period of time. For example, in the United States, a s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (May) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...at would require more than 8 years. May be the new President will not be genial to...
^^
Line 8, column 782, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prompts'' or 'prompt's'?
Suggestion: prompts'; prompt's
...teady progress for longer projects, the prompts policy should not be implemented. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, thus, while, as for, for example, in my opinion, it is true, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 31.0 12.4196629213 250% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2775.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 576.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81770833333 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89897948557 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73012292431 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442708333333 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 855.0 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1164984422 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2857142857 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4571428571 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.02857142857 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148729148757 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439833242038 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058484456216 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11073012256 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434032533952 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.