In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is generally accepted that everyone who wants to make a new attempt in his/her field, is based on the achievements of the processors. On the other hand, some endeavors are so innovative that there is no background to rely one. It is my personal belief that people who are keen on to contribute to our societies with new knowledge should rely on the knowledge that disributed by their precedents.
Though it would be naive to ignore someone the circumstances where the authentical endeavors are so innovative that there is no even background to back up their efforts. Indeed some people are so ingenuine that they do not need a standard knowledge to rely on. For instance, the creator of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg has so superior and fresh idea about the future of social communication which lead him to be the fisrt one who ever created such an application.
However the above example is not the rule, as the majority of people are really need a therotical and experiental basis to nurture their ideas and endeavors. The knowledge exist in each field due to the past achievements of charismatic people who lived in different era and it is very crucila to expand this knowlefge by attempting new endeavors. For example, whether a young scientist in Physics has a really interesting idea about the application of gravity, it would be failure for him/her to cast doubt on the Rules of Newton which condidered the milestone in this field.
Moreover, especially the failures of past attemts give a valuable feedback for the new attempts as they enlighten the dark spots and guide the ambitious scientist what to avoid. For instance, the first failures of missions in Nasa, are used to enhance the next ones and be ultimately succesfull.
To conclude up, the past achievements are very crucial and should be used by the new generation in order to expand this knowledge and produce better results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is generally accepted that everyone w...
^^^
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ge that disributed by their precedents. Though it would be naive to ignore someone the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...en background to back up their efforts. Indeed some people are so ingenuine that they ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'standard knowledge'.
Suggestion: standard knowledge
... are so ingenuine that they do not need a standard knowledge to rely on. For instance, the creator o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...who ever created such an application. However the above example is not the rule, as t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, then, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88235294118 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82561638694 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532507739938 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9822877451 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.416666667 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13354133121 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478591043759 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317162565302 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722676167063 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210719510875 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.