The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue regarding the main benefit of the study of history and it supports that this is the acknowledge that contemporary people are not alternate to their ancestors. Indisputably, daily news are bombed by scenes of wars and cruel crimes which are depicting a savage behavior of modern people. Nevertheless, our modern societies have the privilege to live in well-organized environment with rules, legislation and respect to the human rights. Thus, I generally disagree with the topic of the claim and I would argue that main benefit of history is relative with the progress of learning the foundations of our modern social structure and which factors evolved it.
First of all, it is my personal belief that the study of history offers mainly a unique chance for learning-lessons. An unprecented basis of all the factors that assisted in the formation of our modern society. To illustrate, let us look at the period of the WWII which is without deny a historical event remarkable in history and its outcome determined the evolution of our world. By studying this part of history, one realizes that the passive attitude of England and France against the upcoming power of Adolfus Xitler in Germany, was determinant for the outburst of WWII.
Admittedly, the viewpoint that modern people are not so different finally in comparison with their ancestors has some credible value and evidence to be supported. For instance, the behavior of the members and warriors of Islamic State is representative and their cruelty and inhumanity is equal to the savage of Medieval era.
In conclusion, it is truth that the claim of the topic has a substantial credibility, yet the crucial and most important of the study of history is the thorough search and survey in learning-lesson in determine curves in the evolution of our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of history and it supports that this is the acknowledge that contemporary people are not altern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tructure and which factors evolved it. First of all, it is my personal belief t...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...determinant for the outburst of WWII. Admittedly, the viewpoint that modern pe...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s equal to the savage of Medieval era. In conclusion, it is truth that the clai...
^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... study of history is the thorough search and survey in learning-lesson in determi...
^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...curves in the evolution of our society.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09508196721 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99264349307 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544262295082 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5242992437 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.272727273 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 5.21951772744 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177222761002 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060639532355 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463423575397 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917706729508 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627590471173 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.