Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Τhe characteristics of an effective political leader is always a controversial issue on the realm of political science. A vast portion of political analyzers assert that an effective political leader should present flexibility and adjust to the prominent view of society. Other experts in political science contend that in order to be a political leader effective should remain stable to his/her principles. It is my personal belief that morality and stability of a political leader are crucial to be effective.
It would be naïve for someone to refute the importance of flexibility and adjustment for a political leader. In this way, the political leader gain the support of the society and implement his/her strategy more effective without social disturbances. For instance, the recent victory of progressive political party in Greece according with credible political researchers,could be explained to the successful pre-election programs with social acceptable targets and measures even if some of them were out of the scope of the manifesto of a progressive political party.
On the other hand, when a political leader remains consistent to his/her principles gains sympathy of the society as the morality is always precious. With such an attitude, the political leader gains social acceptance and sets a profile of a stable and trustworthy politician. For example, Mega Thacer, the British prime minister in the nineties, insisted on her strong economy policy despite the serious social disturbances and reactions and finally her stable position was effective as her measures finally were implemented.
To conclude up, albeit the flexibility and the adjustment of a political leader are esteemed traits, the commitment to a list of principles and the stable attitude to them are the characteristics which attribute effectiveness to a political leader.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Τhe characteristics of an effective poli...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al leader are crucial to be effective. It would be naïve for someone to refute ...
^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , could
...ding with credible political researchers,could be explained to the successful pre-elec...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esto of a progressive political party. On the other hand, when a political lead...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her measures finally were implemented. To conclude up, albeit the flexibility a...
^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te effectiveness to a political leader.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52097902098 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17633624433 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496503496503 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8523722049 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.545454545 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313941619267 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150262171269 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589435420673 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209666456629 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581263799379 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Τhe characteristics of an effective poli...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al leader are crucial to be effective. It would be naïve for someone to refute ...
^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , could
...ding with credible political researchers,could be explained to the successful pre-elec...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esto of a progressive political party. On the other hand, when a political lead...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her measures finally were implemented. To conclude up, albeit the flexibility a...
^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te effectiveness to a political leader.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52097902098 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17633624433 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496503496503 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8523722049 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.545454545 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313941619267 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150262171269 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589435420673 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209666456629 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581263799379 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.