A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Nowadays the implementation of a national curriculum at schools is a controversial issue. A great portion of academics assert that a national curriculum serves the purposes of a long-term plan. On the other hand, some experts on this field contend that the principles of the schools should have more flexibility on the formation of the curriculum in their schools. It is my personal belief that a common national curriculum should be implemented in every school unit as with this strategy is succeed an equal level of education in each student.
However, it would be naïve for someone to ignore some beneficial credits of the option of implementation of different curriculums at schools. Each area in the territory of a country has its special assets and needs and a modified curriculum would probably satisfy better these demands. For instance, the students at schools in Alaska may need more teaching hours for the sustainable ways of economy than other students or the students in that state of California need more teaching hours of the new technologies and their applications due to the impact of Silicon Valley in the area.
In contrary with the above argument, some academics claim that the formation and the implementation of the curriculum at schools should be exclusively at the responsibility of the Ministry of Education in each country. The national curriculum serves a strategy scratched at the highest level of education and satisfy the purposes of each country. For example, a recent research published in the monthly magazine of European Union, depicts that the majority of the European students present a significant lack of knowledge about the history of Europe. Thus, it would be expected someone that each country will increase the teaching hours in European History nationally and not fragmented in selected areas of each country.
To conclude up, an implemented national curriculum provides a standard of level of education in each country which serves the strategy of each country so it is crucial a common implementation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...ry school unit as with this strategy is succeed an equal level of education in each stu...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al level of education in each student. However, it would be naïve for someone t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... impact of Silicon Valley in the area. In contrary with the above argument, som...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted in selected areas of each country. To conclude up, an implemented national ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 331.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20241691843 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00979437609 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456193353474 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6150761343 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130288432479 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580123863154 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200891519657 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868747540952 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219203919447 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.