eachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The factors that should be taken into consideration in order to set someone the amount of the the teachers' salaries was always a controversial issue on the realm of the education. A vast portion of academics saasert that teachers' salaries should be based according with their students' academic perfomance. On the other hand, credible scientists on the factor of education contend that the wage of a professor should be unrelated to the academic perdomances of his/her students and should be based on other factors such as his/her academic background. It is my personal belief that teachers' salaries should not be a result of the perfomancr of their students as there are more objective factors to demontrate the amount of their wage.
The academic perfomance of tudents of course is one section of the overall evaluation of the teachers that each one educational institution should take into consideration in order to set the amount of their salaries. When a teacher is responsible for some courses and the average grades of students on these courses are extolled, probably this esteemed academic perdomance is due to the prrofessionalism and skills of the teacher and accordinlgy should be praised for this even if this approval is depicted on his/her salary.
On the other hand, most od the times the academic perfomance of students is based mostly on their personal effort and diligence and lesser to the working competence of the teachers. Thus, it would be unmoral and unfair, the salary of a teacher to be based on a possible lack of effort and interest of his/her students. For instance, a recent research on the ScientificAmerican magazine mentions that the majority of the students at the universities in USA are performing lower grades the last five years. Moreover, this survey cites that the academic background of the professors in these universities is generally enkanced in contrast with a decade ago.
To conclude up, it is sure that the academic perfomance of students is a part of the general evaluation of a teacher, however his/her salary should be based on more objective elements as his/her academic activity such as researches and publications in credible academic magazines
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n in order to set someone the amount of the the teachers salaries was always a controve...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n in order to set someone the amount of the the teachers salaries was always a controve...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...rest of his/her students. For instance, a recent research on the ScientificAmerican magazine ment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in contrast, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11388888889 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9868216209 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438888888889 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3884852431 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.363636364 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7272727273 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 5.21951772744 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251793538353 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117694169166 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630417572769 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167057160031 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547672883776 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.