In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether past achievements have an impact on a person’s current significant contribution or not. Nevertheless, experience and achievement help a person to face future risks and gained a lot of learning from it. But sometimes, many people having considerable contribution perhaps failed to achieve their endeavor. Hence I generally disagree with the statement that not experiencing past achievements can hamper the possibility of significant contribution.
Firstly, over time, we witnessed many great leaders, entrepreneurs, and contributing figures who have experienced failures in their life but resurgent to make it possible. However, those figures never gave up because of their ambition and will to make a change in a society over their immediate personal gratification. If these figures had given up because of their past failures we might never able to know about their truth behind success stories.
Furthermore, perhaps previous achievements of one bolster his or her future ambition but, to determine the factor of significant contribution experience is not only the parameter to prejudice indeed, person’s will and capacity to work, learning from mistake and inkling perspective can add a great deal as a significant contribution.
Additionally, it is very predominant to understand and evaluate significant achievement in terms of questions like is it a successful outcome? overall this ambiguous term has myriad meanings and very subjective and what influenced whom.
In totality, the mistake done in past always teach us a lesson to mitigate further issues in life along with a person’s self-confidence and will power is also important yet, failure and other conflicts in life build human stronger to interact with convoluted reality and bring to more significant contribution and changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- Tidal power the integrated task 85
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 58
- Dr Benson is a renowned scientist known for his work in biochemistry and cardiology to establish the link between high blood pressure and heart disease In a paper published ten years ago he postulates that consuming salty foods increases the salt content 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rhaps failed to achieve their endeavor. Hence I generally disagree with the statement...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...stions like is it a successful outcome? overall this ambiguous term has myriad meanings...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60854092527 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28072576738 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.414281456 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.272727273 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172008145345 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696081547302 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370667881729 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901150914287 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471656592371 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.