In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Making a significant contribution in a certain field is a dream of many researchers, but not everyone can grab a chance for it. Some people insist that every outstanding success is followed by the strong effect of preceding achievements in the field. Although it might be partially true, it is difficult to certainly conclude that the possibility of notable contribution is determined by the influence of preceding research.
It cannot be denied that more advanced techniques or products can be easily created when it is based on previous studies. For the sake of the accumulation of knowledge, the current researchers do not need to start from scratch. For example, engineers simply learn and apply the mathematical and physical formulas rather than verify all the basic theorems and investigate natural phenomena as Newton and Einstein did. It demonstrates that previous research can provide advantages for future steps. Hence, the influence of preceding success can positively affect the advent of future achievements.
On the other hand, there are many cases in which preceding studies do not affect the achievement of a huge success. It happens more frequently in the fields pursuing innovative ideas such as art. Styles of drawing have been continuously changed by the leading painters, who have brought a whole new one. For instance, when Impressionism firstly came out, it was like a revolution as it was a totally different style to represent an object or landscape. It was possible as a painter tried to change the way to depict the world from what it was supposed to be to how it literally looks like. Impressionism is hardly influenced by the previous style but rather created by a creative painter. Therefore, in this case, past success is not vitally essential for further development and achievement.
It can be said that previous success is advantageous for future success up to a certain point. However, it is not a vital element to make a significant achievement. Some of the future success might be a form of the advance of previous research, whereas others might be created as themselves with creators’ passion and endeavors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ment to make a significant achievement. Some of the future success might be a form of the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15954415954 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02725824759 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561253561254 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3234520984 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.611111111 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137114318283 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043936848951 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382584919102 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899380486455 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531232488847 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.