In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any field, experience and previous achievements within that industry play an important role for leading that person to make novel contribution. Because an experienced man has the keen insight and also he possesses discernible expertise. While a person obtains any kind of achievement, those glories will make him confident to express his thoughts and also encourage him to expand his knowledge. Though there are some exceptional situations, I corroborate with the author's thinking.
During the period, when I was seeking a job, I had seen many jobs seeking experienced or a number of achievements specifically on the germane field. However, I found that thing illogical and I thought that those conditions make a competent person deprive of the job since she was lacking of these achievements. But later I have known the importance of the achievements in that particular field. One example I am giving below:
In our varsity there were two categories lecturer. One of them was senior instructor and another was teacher assistant. We attended both of their classes and also noticed the subtle difference. Senior instructor has many achievements in that field and published many papers and written a few books which carried achievements. Throughout my thesis course, I went to them for some kind of help and observed that our senior professor gave us significant information which we could not think about, in the meanwhile assistant teacher provided us hackneyed information. For this reason, I accord to the author's point of view.
Besides, there are some samples where without achievements people can gain success and put a significant mark on that field. Like, an engineer without achievements in business background can be an entrepreneur in that type of field or can achieve success in that. I had personally seen a person who was an engineer but later he was the assistant manager of a business company and he also did not have any achievements in that before joining on that post. After joining there, he shared some ideas which were really credible. So, it is not compulsory to have achievements in a relevant field to make some remarkable and amazing contributions.
At the end, I want to concede that, author's hypothesis is based upon some factors. Indeed, to be successful and notable in a field, sometime depends on achievements or may be not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... corroborate with the authors thinking. During the period, when I was seeking a ...
^^^
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar field. One example I am giving below: In our varsity there were two categories...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, really, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09278350515 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99323021905 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548969072165 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8493184246 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198728117161 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590597368974 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541715371536 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106214696783 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322088146739 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.