Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.
Knowledge is power, but the proper way of acquiring knowledge is apocryphal. Now-a-days students study so that they can obtain good marks, they compete with each other. Though they study hard, their motive behind this is not inquisitive curious for learning. They do not thoroughgoing deeply for any subject, as a result they do not have the proper and basic knowledge and it precludes them from the all levels of education. Because of this, I accord with the author in his argument.
During my academic period of school life, I admitted in school which is not so big. There was a brilliant boy and I heard that he was standing 1st incessantly from class 1. After a certain time, a new method was introduced in our board examination system which was "srijonshil" where the question pattern was different. In that type of question pattern, the questions was not exact same from the text book but it was difficult and based on basic. There was not enough time to complete the full syllabus and as the boy was concerned about only to get high grades in the exam, so he studied superficially. As a consequence, he was not 1st and also he failed in that term. On the other hand, who were not worry about the results and for this they learned meticulously and had done excellent in that session.
Besides, who are not thinking about any kind of competition can perceive and observe many things, because their minds are in a position of relaxation and equanimity. They participate in many extracurricular activities and also attended many courses which were very beneficial. Those persons who only care about exam and they achieve only penchant knowledge which forestalls to gather information deeply and they do not get all level of education which is virulent. In job sector it hampers very much and for this a person can not get any job easily and it becomes onerous. One example is given below:
Since my varsity life was finished means after our graduation, we all were seeking a job ferrently. However, our result was good, but we did not get any type of job. As the job does not only want good academical result, in their condition they also included many type of dexterity like java, excel etc. other qualification. In our academic time we were only concerned for our varsity exam competition, we did not think to expand our skills, as a result it affected us badly.
At the end, I want to concede that, competition makes student busy only to study for examinations and it also prevents them to acquire other educations which will make expand their qualification. Indeed, students should not only study for obtaining high grades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 713, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'worried'.
Suggestion: worried
...t term. On the other hand, who were not worry about the results and for this they lea...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 816, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and had done excellent in that session. Besides, who are not thinking about any ...
^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mes onerous. One example is given below: Since my varsity life was finished means...
^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
..., in their condition they also included many type of dexterity like java, excel etc. othe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8048245614 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77342755312 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506578947368 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0325654063 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5909090909 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115586312775 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311768092195 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400185982129 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675986896511 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343154003359 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.