In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
The author believes that it is impossible to create a significant contribution in any field without being influenced by past achievements in that field. However, the field of interest plays an important role in deciding the influence of past achievements in a particular field.
In the field of sports like cricket, marathon, etc. past achievements play an important role in inspiring the young generation. These achievements influence a lot of people for particular sports and can influence them to achieve the same success or even more. The future generation hence will be able to make a significant contribution to the related field. The Pythagoras theorem and other laws are paramount factors for new trends in mathematical models.
Without these models, it was impossible for copious progress in the mathematical field.
Some fields, however, require new trends to be followed and new processes to achieve the result. In the field of artificial intelligence, robotics, etc. past references can add limitations to the progress of the process as these fields involve innovation and creativity.
While developing an algorithm in artificial Intelligence by referring the previous algorithms can imitate the output thus resulting in no development in the process. This will not be considered as a significant contribution and hinder the progress.
Conclusively, Past achievements can help to inspire and motivate people for significant contribution in a particular field but it can hinder the progress in a certain field. It's important to innovate, create in particular fields. Hence, the influence of past achievements depends on the field in which one wants to endeavor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st achievements in a particular field. In the field of sports like cricket, mar...
^^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Past
... of sports like cricket, marathon, etc. past achievements play an important role in ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Past
...artificial intelligence, robotics, etc. past references can add limitations to the p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...elds involve innovation and creativity. While developing an algorithm in artificial I...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contribution and hinder the progress. Conclusively, Past achievements can help...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, thus, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 260.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45384615385 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22080882194 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6989441265 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.625 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471645244973 0.243740707755 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16693429625 0.0831039109588 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151657578644 0.0758088955206 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260370388072 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155368636282 0.0667264976115 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.