In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Have you ever thought about what would have been had you started educating in any field without outside support? It does mean not only no teachers, but also no videos, books, newspapers and, of course, Internet. Even with an assumption that you are a genius, inevitably you are going to reach the ceiling of your capacity. Then moving further would depend on going through the experience and figuring out from it the conclusions, rules and theories – the ground for ongoing development. It is simply not only time-consuming; it is the lifelong process. In the case of the assumption that the rest world has been developing not being separated from the information has been already owned, undoubtedly you are likely to end up behind the rest world.
Looking back to the statement, it becomes obvious that it plays on the assumption that the never in the recorded history has the human generation as unprecedentedly developed as it does today. Surely taking the briefest reflection on our history reveals the astounding speed has been reached by us over the latest centuries. Indeed, throughout the history there have been those who dared to challenge the prevailing notions of their times. The knowledge we have today – from the way in which gravity works to the way our traits are passes on – is because of them.
To illustrate the point, take a closer look the time before our era, the time span of the first observations and innovations when it was conceivable to put forward the remarkable contributions in any field of endeavor. There had not been yet any noticeable progress in any direction and being the first meant being the considerable achiever. That is why there is a tremendous blizzard of Greek scientists who were simultaneously astronomers, economists, philosophers, politics in whatever direction and which are well known among the current generation. Moreover, it is not mentioning the scientists of our Era.
However, even among them there is an outrageous instance. Consider prominent Nicolaus Copernicus who as is thought was the first person questioned the concepts of building the Universe. On having made the mathematical calculations about how the stars move and later incorporated it in his theory of heliocentrism, he become a rock star of the physical astronomy. Surprisingly, but no one knows AL- Battani Trigometry, perhaps with the exception of Copernicus himself. Actually, there was a significant base for his calculation had made before by the extraordinary scientific minds of two Arabic astronomers – Al Battani and AL Jusi. So, the heliocentric theory by Copernicus was made based on the shoulders of two giants.
Inevitably, an important question one might ask is whether it is worthwhile to carry out explorations in the new fields of endeavor taking into consideration the progress has already done in the major directions and that it is becoming harder and harder not just to make a comprehensive concepts, but even to make meaningful modifications of the prevailing theories. Undoubtedly all disciplines are intersecting, specially when talking about the natural science where the Mathematic is a base. Consider the seemingly new idea of the first computer made by Alan Turing already almost a century ago. Having given an invaluable push in further developing in the sphere, the concept was innovative and fresh in that time. However, even here there is a huge background in the Mathematic. So, the answer seems to be apparent – yes, it is worth, however there must be a at least some knowledge in the studied field.
All things considered, it could be concluded that the pace of developing of our race has been changing in the growing side and so has the speed of developing science and carrying out the researchers as well. So not being able to catch up with this rate means being behind the rest ones and being without the significant innovations. There is no need to retreat to a Luddite attitude to new things, but rather embrace a hopeful posture to the possibilities that the current time gives us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...acity. Then moving further would depend on going through the experience and figuring out...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...e knows AL- Battani Trigometry, perhaps with the exception of Copernicus himself. Actually, there was...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... question one might ask is whether it is worthwhile to carry out explorations in ...
^^
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'concept'?
Suggestion: concept
...harder not just to make a comprehensive concepts, but even to make meaningful modificati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 863, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...yes, it is worth, however there must be a at least some knowledge in the studied ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, well, while, at least, of course, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.5258426966 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3395.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 673.0 442.535393258 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04457652303 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.09335287823 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97554811615 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 345.0 215.323595506 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512630014859 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1062.9 704.065955056 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1429826872 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.068965517 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2068965517 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93103448276 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162433527084 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338165120001 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561469479063 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803642107924 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609278300155 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.