In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
People often create some desires or goals they want it to be accomplished in the future. Which needs a lot of perseverance or strong determination to achieve success. As in the above statement, in field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by the past achievement within that field. I strongly accord with the above statement. Being influenced by past achievement one can be motivated towards his goals.
The past teaches us to make future. For the future endeavor, one’s need to get influenced by the past milestones or achievement. It helps to inspire and motivate toward one’s goal. For instance, if one has a desire to be a politician or he makes some goals to achieve in the political field, then he/she becomes aware about the past history of the politics, political figures, political condition and so forth. How far had the politics gone, what did the previous leaders do, it may be bad and good. Not only good things inspire us to imitate, but bad things to motivate one to strive for. Because, seeing the worst situation, one can be more tempted make reforms. Hence, for striving for the endeavor in a particular field one becomes more motivated toward it being influenced by the previous doings or achievement in the same field.
Some people make the endeavor to reform in certain fields. Well, to make those reforms, it requires intense research about the past. What errors were done previously, or what was the best aspect about those should be known. Moreover, from these, it makes realize where is the weak point where it need to be made abrupt changes. We can consider in science and research, to invent a new theory one needs to be aware of the previous prevailing theories and then further researching them one can have his idea on it. And further point out the errors and tries to correct it or find a better way to it followed by a new theories.
Not being influenced by the past achievements within a field and thinking of some endeavor on the same field will leads nowhere or it would obscure the goals. Working for the desire or endeavor and becoming unaware of the previous achievement or accomplishment on the same field will produce more skeptical results. It may produce worthless result rather than being a beneficiary because the same process may have been done previously. Therefore, to become updated about previous milestone is prominent to do or invent new ideas on a particular field.
In the final analysis, for the future endeavors in a particular field one need to be aware or influenced about the previous achievement, which helps one to motivate, inspire, keep updated and makes easy to produce the intended result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'theory'?
Suggestion: theory
...nd a better way to it followed by a new theories. Not being influenced by the past ac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...of some endeavor on the same field will leads nowhere or it would obscure the goals. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90752688172 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73448619123 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470967741935 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.3311445111 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0833333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20833333333 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411771184313 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127351823764 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173499957885 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256110764747 0.150359130593 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158031531029 0.0667264976115 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.