The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Environmental problems are vulnerable problems which will affect all the organisms in the environment. The wastes or trashes are the primary sources to pollute the environment, if not disposed correctly, it will lead to divergent issue of pollution in environment. I agree with the above assertion that the strict laws should be made to limit the amount of trash from each household in cities and towns. Implementing such law will help to confine the amount of waste.
First and foremost, law are the guiding principle for the human, it will avail to direct the human behavior. Amending the stringent laws about the limiting of wastage from the household, will certainly abate the use of the waste producing product or find the alternatives to control it. People will be aware and they will think before the collection of wastage or production of wastage. The limitations helps the people to find a better way. By restricting the amount of disposal, people will be aware of throwing the wastage and they will think about limiting the disposal product, such as if they were using many plastics then try to recycle it, and use it further.
Secondly, there are lots of the people who are unknown about the garbage disposal, they do not know about the consequences of the prolific pollution in the long term environmental effect. Proposing the strict law, will make people aware or disseminate information about pollution, their effects, their control and so forth. Thinking about the global problems like the global warming people should indeed be aware of their behavior in the wastage disposal and other environmental behavior. How we treat out environment the environment will be treating us in the same manner. The pollution is leading us to global warming, every year there is rise is temperature of the earth, which is heralding very severe sign of future. The wastes, the pollution, ignition of harmful gases are leading to this severe issue. Thus, people need to be aware of such issue to encounter the problem that are likely to arise in future.
However, some people might think that formulating such strict law will not help to reduce the waste because people do not readily follow the law, also wastage are not only produced in the household but also in public areas. The initiating of such law will not surely create drastic change readily to produce intended result, but it is the matter of spreading the public awareness about the pollution, wastage disposal. Such law will help people to apprehend the future consequences of the pollution and they will, in turn, minimize the wastes.
To sum up, eradicating the environmental pollution is a difficult job, but institutionalizing the strict law to make people aware about the drawbacks and harmful effect of the high disposal that will lead to pollution. Thus, maintaining such law produces the efficacious result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'help'.
Suggestion: help
... production of wastage. The limitations helps the people to find a better way. By res...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...er environmental behavior. How we treat out environment the environment will be tre...
^^^
Line 5, column 904, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...er the problem that are likely to arise in future. However, some people might think th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0607966457 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72758497063 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463312368973 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.030646169 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.952380952 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187063290978 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681589190153 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573473209319 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126041975163 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930897599537 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.