Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Research are done in every field to discover new theories, ideas, innovative principle and so forth to solve problems prevailing in certain realm. Furthermore, research also helps in the continuity of the leftover finding by the antecedent; helps complete the incomplete works by the archaic researcher. The above claim asserts that the research should not limit the investigations to only those state up to which it is viable to make the pragmatic result or has lucrative implication and I blatantly agree with the above reason mentioned that, it is impossible to anticipate the outcome of the research with any certainty. The outcome might be incomplete or concluded with flaws or the result might be aberrant in the future.
First and foremost, the research outcomes or results must not be left it for just it can produce pragmatic implication; those research might be incomplete or it might not consider much factor for anticipating the result for the definite problem. Moreover, the result must be first verified by the certain measures or a critical analysis must be done. Comparison with the standard should be performed to be best made applicable in the reality. For instance, to control the population of a certain place, research is conducted and the researcher found some result that might control the population but if the researcher has done it more deliberately than more strategic or long term panacea might be found.
Admittedly, there are myriad of research performed, which seems plausible at first but that is filled with vanity afterwards. There are plethora of such examples, for instance, on investigating the evolution of the species in history, we find many theories, a theory is found and accepted at some extent and afterwards it is considered feeble which haven’t considered some fundamental factors on it. Therefore, it is conspicuous that such are incomplete research and they might have been performed on the due haste. In addition to, the researcher need conspicuously profound knowledge and laborious time and effort to extract the accurate and most effective result. Hence, by just getting the pragmatic result, on shouldn’t leave it on that point.
Finally, the research is considered to be critical for eradicating the problems, discovering innovative ideas or principles, so it needs much consultation with the expert as it result the real expert in that field, it should consider wide variety of factor affecting the problem, so that the result might not transmute in the upcoming condition. Some result might produce the result which is not anticipated that might occur or deviated from the expected pattern in consideration of the change in the condition. Hence, the researcher should also extrapolate the result so that it might be viable on future.
To sum up, the research need many factors to be considered to produce the efficacious result. The incomplete research is likely to be aberrant in the future; therefore, it is obvious for the researcher to not leave the outcome on a point on which just that they discover the pragmatic result.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or eradicating the problems, discovering innovative ideas or principles, so it ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20359281437 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93098124069 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437125748503 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.5787319476 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231988704696 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863733295551 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829515206446 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159246580815 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767607872539 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.