All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
School serves to give education for the students, aid them for their behavior what activities should be done and what is not to be done. I agree with the above assertion that parents should also manage some time for their children schools; they should be aware about the activities of the children in schools, how are the teachers providing insight for the students, it’s the matter of the need to keep to the children in the efficacious track.
First and foremost, parents need to be aware about the school activities; the main purpose of the parents to take their children is fulfilled or not. How are the teaching learning process? Are they effective enough to provide students with the good educations? Giving some time for their offspring’s institution helps to manifest such issue. If parents are busy enough to not give time to the children’s schools then they will never know how the school providing knowledge to their children, because just by phone call, one can’t assert that lectures are giving them eminent knowledge.
Secondly, the student in early age need guidance, they are prone to be involved in bad activities that parent’s do not want to. The activities of a child primarily depends upon his friends circle, how are the friends. If the friends are indeed involve in bad activities then they can also learns to imitate such activities. For instance, we need to look no further than our society’s kids nowadays, parents are busy enough to provide time for the inspection for their activities, and they are subsumed in inhaling toxic substances, which can ruin their life afterwards.
However, repeating same act will in need seems boring and in some way it can be irritating. Same could occur for the children giving enough time for them, speculating in every activities. Children might feel awkward with their friends visiting them in the schools. Some children might want to feel independent and if parent visits them often, they could be discomfited. Therefore, the parents should also account on the frequency of the volunteering time for children.
To sum up, the claim is undoubtedly plausible in generalization that they should devote some time to their children’s school, so that they can be apprehended about how school is treating their children, the education process, children progress, their activities, their friends circle and so forth. But in some respect, high frequency speculation might somehow nettle the kids in front of their friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is friends circle, how are the friends. If the friends are indeed involve in bad a...
^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'involved'.
Suggestion: involved
... the friends. If the friends are indeed involve in bad activities then they can also le...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
...ve in bad activities then they can also learns to imitate such activities. For instanc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1760391198 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80798303813 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479217603912 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.174116078 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.611111111 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217868493772 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805867569122 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633033679085 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145820507609 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450062544784 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.