The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
History serves to manifest the past activities, persuade the modern people with the behavior of the primitive people, how was the life back then, which indeed fills the gap between the skeptics of people of how it changed to now. In the above assertion it assails that there is illusion in the difference in the person's life now and in earlier times. However, the claim is uncertain or simply vague, people do not think that earlier people were different from the modern people rather people are unknown about how was the earlier circumstance and life before, so I utterly disagree with the above contention.
First and foremost, there is illusion in the change of the circumstance or how all over occurred to result in this new world. Most of the people know that the back then and now they all are the human being, rather they are obscured about the person's behavior and how this occurred gradually. People find difficult to visualize how was the change occurred, how the previous people used to live their life.
Admittedly, history is the beneficial realm to clear the doubt of the people what has happened in the earlier times. How the evolution was occurred, what created the vicissitudes? Speculating every aspect in the real world, people question how might have this occurred. For instance, watching the all over progress of technology, one questions that from where might have it started, who might have invented the technology first, how did it all began. However, after reading the history it makes apparently clear about such skeptics; history has it all information about it. History subsumes every realm, it includes every field such as literature, science, philosophy, politics, etc.
However, some might think that we hear about many heroic figures of the past and those have the character that modern people might not own. But, it does need to generalize that the people at now are different from the ancient people. Every people are different, previous or now we are same species, it is the matter of circumstances which intends to change the behavior, propriety, etc.
To sum up, history indeed is very informative subject that help to fill up the gap of doubt of people, how have this thing in the modern world occurred, who is behind it, how was it possible. But the claim of the people think that of difference in modern people and earlier people is not possible to agree, as we discussed people doubt on the morph.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...re is illusion in the difference in the persons life now and in earlier times. However,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ing, rather they are obscured about the persons behavior and how this occurred graduall...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
... are different from the ancient people. Every people are different, previous or now w...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to change the behavior, propriety, etc. To sum up, history indeed is very inform...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 340, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... agree, as we discussed people doubt on the morph.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, so, then, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89663461538 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48362681088 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454326923077 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0792029896 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.823529412 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4705882353 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254218363702 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935011867136 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702891899327 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157298985963 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618275092853 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.