In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans' ambitions and their passion to become famous, wealthy and successful have been an important motivational factor for all their endeavors and achievements during history. Even though some people may believe that the more experienced an individual, the more he/she likely to become successful, some others, including the author of the statement above, assert that they are actually beginners who can significantly contribute to the advancement of various fields. As far as I am concerned, this is a controversial issue and a person's success in a particular field is highly depends on the field in which he/she is working. In the following paragraphs, I will explain my viewpoints toward this issue in detail.
To begin with, in highly professional fields of knowledge and endeavor, a beginner cannot contribute significantly. Generally, various breakthroughs and remarkable achievements in almost all scientific areas have been achieved by those who possess a complete mastery over that subject. They need to know different previously discussed or evaluated ideas, theories, and concepts, and based on them, form their own hypotheses, examine them, and combine their findings with accepted ideas or apply them to oppose former wrong theories or attitudes. This is actually the process of scientific methods which have been applied by all scholars and scientists during history, almost all of them were not newcomers.
On the other hand, there are some fields in which becoming successful considerably depends on being creative and imaginative. The arts and literature are among these fields. Almost all writers, especially novelists, as well as artists, such as musicians, actors, sculptures, painters, and dancers, primarily rely on their imagination and creativity to produce artistic masterpieces. Even if they are knowledgeable enough, without some levels of creativity, which lends their works some peculiarity and originality, they cannot be successful and attract the public's attention. In the history of art, there are many artists who reached a high degree of respect from the public when they were very young, For instance, Mozart composed his first piece of music when he was about five years old. Thus, in the arts, being experienced is not very influential.
Finally, in business-related fields, even though being experienced can be beneficial, it is not enough for prosperity. Successful entrepreneurs or businessmen are usually those who are exceptionally courageous and willing to encounter challenging situations and do not withdraw when confronting the first difficulty and obstacle. Such characteristics are not specific to only experienced persons. Thus, many beginners in the business fields can become considerably prosperous and known just after several years of initiating their enterprises. Admittedly, past lessons and experiences may help them to predict various problems, prevent them, or solve them more effectively, this feature is not the only necessary trait to become successful in these fields.
In conclusion, to decide about the contribution of a person in a field, we should consider the kinds of activities they have to accomplish and the amount of mental capability, creativity and knowledge, they must possess to be successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 530, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ed, this is a controversial issue and a persons success in a particular field is highly...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tors, sculptures, painters, and dancers, primarily rely on their imagination and ...
^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ey cannot be successful and attract the publics attention. In the history of art, there...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2787.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58517034068 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12516038681 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557114228457 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7483649987 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.35 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.95 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105532961018 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323261882705 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326848727232 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597451179735 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325401037078 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.