In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The capacity of knowledge is limitless when you have the ability to question the unknown and the ability to have innovative curiosity. When we dive into who has the ability to come up with these innovative ideas that are derived from curiosity, the beginner and the expert both have the capacity to contribute equally. In regards to science discoveries and innovations both the inexperience of a beginner and the experience from an expert can both result in success.
Even though a beginner has the ability to bring in new methodologies and radical thinking, in conjunction, with the enthusiasm and eagerness that creates value in their contribution. This value is not necessarily equal in value compared to the deep and profound understanding and the efficient problem solving techniques of an expert's contribution. Experts are shown to be more of value to those in the governing sectors. People elect those who have years of experience under their belt because of the profound knowledge and understanding of the policies in their governing states that they have gained over the years rather than beginners because they lack that experience. Business ventures are another aspect where experts are highly valued versus a beginner due the experience level. Experts have the ability to understand the market's fluctuating state and the ability to handle a variety of populations and situations. Experts have the ability to have higher contributions versus a beginner because of the increased experience.
In contrast, Beginners do in their own way of making valued contributions. Innovations, new generation technology, and ideas all have made significant contributions and have dominated significantly. Take Mark Zuckerberg, who is the cofounder of facebook which is the leading social media platform today. Social media in a way that facebook does it was revolutionary for it's time about 17 years ago. Start-ups like Amazon and Apple all started in someone's garage and became multi-billion companies. The innovators were all beginners and gained experience throughout time and are now experts in their field. The founders of these companies who were once beginners are now considered experts in their field. Mark is called upon to explain the working of social media and now is sought out by beginners for help. People trust the company founders because of their now earned experience, without the developed experience their contributions would not have been as valuable as they are now versus about two decades ago. Experts not only have the curiosity and the inner passion, they have the knowledge that they need behind them in order to make these extraordinary contributions to our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The capacity of knowledge is limitless when you have the ability to question th...
^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...ave the capacity to contribute equally. In regards to science discoveries and innovations bot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...icient problem solving techniques of an experts contribution. Experts are shown to be m...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r belt because of the profound knowledge and understanding of the policies in the...
^^
Line 3, column 1035, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er because of the increased experience. In contrast, Beginners do in their own w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that facebook does it was revolutionary for its time about 17 years ago. Start-u...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29603729604 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96486453308 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475524475524 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8738487594 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.21951772744 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145242227256 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487926404312 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227757558818 0.0758088955206 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951156500124 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168320759793 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.