Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents and create a foundation of success for them later in life. If we let the talent of a child just simmer and not at least facilitate a little growth in that area they might miss out on opportunities in the future. Take for example, Tiger Woods, he is one of the greatest golfers in the world. He started out when he was merely four years of age and his father saw this great gift his son had and jumped at that opportunity for success. With identifying the young talents you can allow them to grow as an individual and set up a foundation to when they can use their talents as a tool for life. Parents who see these talents in their child can not only help the child increase and develop those talents even further, it allows an opportunity for the parents to become involved with the child's life and create a positive family dynamic. Thus is very advantageous for the child's overall development, especially if the talent is something a child loves to do. This especially true when it comes to sports because practice and proper training is required to become an elite athlete. Another example is gymnastics, gymnastics is a sport where skills are developed at a very young age. Gymnasts start when they are toddlers this is good for mental and cognitive development. The increasing the child's capability in their field can have effects that trickle down further into life such as leading to potential scholarships for college.
However, focusing on a child's special talent can have negative effects such as resentment or missing out on other normal developmental social activities. If a child does show a talent in a particular area, but may not necessarily love doing, it may have an adverse effect if it is pushed to continue further. Let's go back to Tiger, he was a child golfer turned into a world champion at a young age. The outcome is good yes, but he did miss out on a lot of normal social interaction compared to a normal child. He missed out in teenage years on the ability to maintain friendships due to the obsession of golf. Golf was the number one priority to him and his father. This led to miss gathering with friends, missed school days, and otherwise normal social interaction in his age group. Tiger was trained to live breath golf from an early age which could lead to resentment and anger toward the game and family.
By allowing a child to be pushed to succeed in their talents, is a positive thing and it allows the child to grow as an individual and develop a foundation for success, especially in sports. This would be especially beneficial to the child if they love their talent. They can grow this talent into something that can lay a foundation for their future and help them succeed in life.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rts because practice and proper training is required to become an elite athlete. ...
^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ct if it is pushed to continue further. Lets go back to Tiger, he was a child golfer...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, at least, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63582677165 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55650615029 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472440944882 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9568301461 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.045454545 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86363636364 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290523815632 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875665749921 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106513029629 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184557381564 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957509327569 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rts because practice and proper training is required to become an elite athlete. ...
^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ct if it is pushed to continue further. Lets go back to Tiger, he was a child golfer...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, at least, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63582677165 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55650615029 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472440944882 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9568301461 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.045454545 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86363636364 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290523815632 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875665749921 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106513029629 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184557381564 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957509327569 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.