In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author asserts that a beginner, someone who is just beginning his career journey, stating at a new job or carrying out a new research is more likely to make important contributions when compared to an expert. Others may argue otherwise stating that an expert with his level of expertise and experience is more likely to contribute better, however, this is not entirely so.
There is a common saying, “Fresh from Bakery”. Metaphorically, it means that any one fresh into a system has fresh ideas to bring to the table different from the status quo. As a result, whatever contributions the beginner is likely to add is going to be from a fresh perspective. Something experience cannot add. For instance, a newly admitted teaching assistant who got admitted based on his interest in a field of study was admitted because he showed interest and possible potential to contribute meaningfully to an ongoing research work by a Professor in a school environment or a Faculty member.
Secondly, a newbie or beginner in a system is less burdened with other demands of the field of inquiry as he will have less responsibilities to cater to. Hence, is not weighed down by other bureaucratic or irrelevant aspect of a new job, or research when compared to the expert who has the responsibility of. As a result, he can focus primarily on getting results relating to the subject matter, giving him ample time to research more efficiently and effectively. An example of responsibily could be public appearance or forums for discussions of which the expert is a member of and has to devote time and effort to contribute as well.
Lastly, a newbie would be determined to make his mark or prove his worth in the system. Hence, is more determined to impress the faculty with relevant contributions, to show that he is reliable and can be depended upon. As he grows into the field, he will be handed responsibilities from time to time, based on how efficient he has proven to be, hence less time for proper research and more time dedicated to getting the work down.
In conclusion, A beginner always has a fresh perspective to look at things, would want to prove his work in the short term and is usually less burderned in any field of inquiry when compare to the expert, giving time and resources available. However, it is important to note that the groups of people for the purpose of which they are working towards need to work together to achieve the overall aim on the research. Where the expert brings experience, the beginner brings curiosity, new perspective and should be willing to learn the ropes from the expert.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new research'.
Suggestion: new research
...y, stating at a new job or carrying out a new research is more likely to make important contri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun responsibilities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...of the field of inquiry as he will have less responsibilities to cater to. Hence, is...
^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., giving him ample time to research more efficiently and effectively. An example ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80487804878 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88458903135 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485587583149 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4689265316 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.470588235 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5294117647 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176415009789 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575135983943 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037986705228 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104764109426 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035645203314 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.