In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I agree with the statement that in any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. Although experts have a wealth of knowledge and experience which can be invaluable, beginners are often unencumbered by preconceived notions or established ways of thinking about a problem. This fresh perspective allows them to approach topics from completely new angles and come up with creative solutions that experienced professionals may not consider. Additionally, because they lack expertise in their chosen field, beginners tend to ask questions that could lead others down unexplored paths or open up entirely new areas for exploration.
At first glance it might appear as though an expert would be better suited for making important contributions due to their years of practice and study; however this assumption overlooks some key factors such as complacency or stagnation within certain fields where research has stagnated due largely in part by “experts” who don't challenge existing theories enough or take risks on innovative ideas presented by newcomers who are willing try something different regardless if it fails initially . In these cases having someone who is unfamiliar but passionate about a topic can bring forth much needed change instead relying on those already entrenched within an area whose perspectives may become too narrow over time leading them away from potential breakthroughs.
Finally , while there will always be exceptions where experts make significant advances , overall I believe novice researchers should still given ample opportunity pursue projects since they often possess unique insight into problems at hand allowing them provide valuable input even when compared against seasoned veterans .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...use they lack expertise in their chosen field, beginners tend to ask questions that c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ed due largely in part by “experts” who dont challenge existing theories enough or t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...fferent regardless if it fails initially . In these cases having someone who is un...
^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...from potential breakthroughs. Finally , while there will always be exceptions w...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... where experts make significant advances , overall I believe novice researchers sh...
^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... when compared against seasoned veterans .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, so, still, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 268.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64179104478 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92916665641 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.798507462687 0.4932671777 162% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.663824136 60.3974514979 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 216.0 118.986275619 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.2857142857 23.4991977007 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 5.21951772744 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165022522727 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913255517873 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12043494344 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100033761784 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784031100489 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.3 14.1392134831 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.45 48.8420337079 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.1639044944 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.38706741573 130% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.