Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
We agree with the claim that governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need to thrive. However, we believe that the reason on which this claim is based is not necessarily true, as there are several nations where cultural traditions are preserved and generated in non-major cities. Major cities must receive the proper financial support in order to thrive for other reasons.
Consider Brazil, or China, or India, for example. Although it is true that there are several museums in these countries' major cities, cultural traditions are generated in several non-major cities, in remote areas. These countries are actually so large, with so many diverse communities, that there are many more cultural traditions created and spread out throughout their territories, in their several minor cities, than museums, universities and other facilities in their major cities can properly preserve and display to the public.
Nevertheless, major cities must receive the proper financial support to thrive. Generally, it is in the major cities that the majority of a nation's people live and work. Therefore, a nation's economy is largely dependent on major cities. Through adequate funding, governments ensure major cities have well sized infrastructure to support its population, fostering economic development. We believe that this is a better reason to support the claim.
Minor cities and other locations where cultural traditions are mostly generated must also receive financial support from governments. Acting that way, they provide the necessary resources to preserve a nation's cultural heritage and history. It is paramount for a country's identity to celebrate their cultural traditions.
Finally, we believe both major and minor cities must receive adequate financial support from governments, but for different reasons. In the few major cities, with larger populations and heavy importance in a nation's economy, government funding ensures the proper infrastructure for the economy to thrive; in the several minor cities, with diverse communities full of history and traditions, government funding guarantees the nation's culture is preserved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ions people live and work. Therefore, a nations economy is largely dependent on major c...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 201, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...ide the necessary resources to preserve a nations cultural heritage and history. It is pa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...r populations and heavy importance in a nations economy, government funding ensures the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70731707317 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77888104784 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.8046198146 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519751434639 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197440703581 0.0831039109588 238% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132803456563 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335916619604 0.150359130593 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149297639303 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.