Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether a leader who generally gets influenced by others' opinions will accomplish little. Indisputably, there are several examples of leaders who listened to more logical opinions and achieved success. Nevertheless, I would mostly agree with the prompt that a leader's accomplishments will be little if he/she is influenced by shifts in popular opinion.
First of all, leaders who change their focus from developing the country based on what others say will not achieve desirable success. Because no one can make all the people satisfied with his works, there will always be some people who will criticize the whole idea. For example, when Sheikh Hasina, the prime minister of Bangladesh, took the decision to build the Padma Bridge, opposition leaders and several pessimists predicted that it will not be possible to construct the bridge over the river, which is known for its decimation. She, however, refused to opt for others' opinions and took the risk of constructing the bridge, and finally, she successfully completed it. If she had listened to others, she would not have accomplished the success.
Furthermore, she also declared in her election manifesto that if her party wins, they will provide a 24/7 power supply to all the citizens; as a result, she planned to build a nuclear power plant, which, according to the builders, is environmentally safe. But, environmentalists went south with this decision of building the power plant, adding that it will not help the people but rather lead the whole living beings to a cataclysm. However, in the end, she again proudly completed the project and ensured a 100 percent power supply to all the inhabitants. Therefore, if she then was influenced capriciously by others' remarks, it would be possible to keep her promise.
Admittedly, it is always not true that listening to others' productive opinions and carrying out these is detrimental. For instance, if a government wants to supersede an abandoned forest by building an economic zone, but environmentalists and other concerned people contradict the idea, rather suggest renovating the zone with a zoo, resulting in producing less carbon dioxide that is the primary cause of escalating the earth's temperature and increasing visitors, which leads to profit. In this scenario, if the government listens to this recommendation, it will not be a negligible accomplishment, instead, citizens will accolade the government.
In conclusion, although in some cases influenced by others' opinions may result in a successful, in most cases a leader will not be able to achieve his/her goal and thus will accomplish little. So, leaders should be focused on their aim and listened to those recommendations which are actually innocuous for the country and its citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 422, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
... is the primary cause of escalating the earths temperature and increasing visitors, wh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27171492205 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03908302206 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538975501114 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1710219274 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.235294118 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4117647059 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1176470588 5.21951772744 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1877874428 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691305567321 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570538845643 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124405942932 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708926955453 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.