Recently, there is a wide discussion about whether those in power should step down after five years. Some may hold that to prevent plenty of issues, it is necessary to require those in power to step down. However, from my perspective, it is not suitable for all professions.
To begin with, it is true that the regulation can help eliminate the many problems. To be more specific, abusing of power could be a critical one. If a person holds power for too long, he may lose his original orientation. For instance, a key opinion leader of a company, who has the right to decide which raw material is the company going to purchase. Once, he may evaluate the price and the quality of material, taking the benefit of the company as the primary consideration. But after a while, he found the bribe from a material provider is profitable, so he continually purchases the material from that provider without considering the price and quality. As a result, replacing the position in a period of time indeed helps prevent some problems.
Furthermore, despite the strategy seems awesome, in reality, it is not campable to some professions. In many positions, experience is highly valued. If those in power step down in five years, they don't have sufficient time to accumulate enough experience. For example, professors in universities are usually lifetime titles. This is because only an experienced person without worried about how to keep his title can makein the largest
In conclusion, although the requirement that those in power should step down after five years prevents lots of issues, it is not appropriate and should not be applied to every profession.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...ld step down after five years. Some may hold that to prevent plenty of issues, it is...
^^^^
Line 3, column 701, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s a result, replacing the position in a period of time indeed helps prevent some problems. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... in power step down in five years, they dont have sufficient time to accumulate enou...
^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to keep his title can makein the largest In conclusion, although the requirement ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 278.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97482014388 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82441910934 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568345323741 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.1256462197 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199715142228 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586694025215 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707163463081 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140768426337 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722210821366 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.