The statement made here positively asserts a solution to many of the problems that occur due to contrasting view points, not only for individuals, but also dives dipper by applying this solution to solve problems of nations.
It is the nature which separates us, as human beings, through uniqueness of each individual and its thinking pattern. If everyone would think in a similar way, there would not have been any individuality, in fact, we would be called as robots or mechanical beings than human beings. It is the views and ideas and thoughts that separate us from ourselves. When two people have contradicitng or contrasting views on the same subjects, the first natural thing comes in mind is proving yourself and superiority over the other. This leads to conflicts and on a bigger scneario, we have seen historically, mankind had been adversely affected. For instance, United States when dropped a nuclear on Japan to put an end to the World War II, a catastrophy which today also, causes the children born in Japan handicapped or disorderd, either mentally or physically, in some form. This problem of war could have been solved if the two nations would have came to some conlclusion through mutual discussion or kind of stepping back by one of the nations, this harm could have been avoided.
On the other hand, not in every situation the authors claim is valid. For example, if two judges of American Idols have different opinions on the same performance, they don't necessarily discuss if their views match or not. They simply present their own views about the performance, one may like it, the other may not. This doesn't necessarily lead to conflicts and no mutual discussion is required.
Talking about an in general subject, a married couple or couple in a relationship having issues with each other on certain things should have a healthy discussion rather than fighting on silly things or in other words, just try to listen to other's views and not presenting your own works best sometimes.
But, some major conflicting issues with certain nations, can only be solved by some kind of treaty or mutual agreement. For instance, the territorial issues between India and Pakistan, for the region of Kashmir has been debated since decades. This has been a much violent issues in front of the nations. Several meetings and alliances were formed and conducted to solve this issue. The solution to this could only by taking a step back by one of nations again, to put an end to the harm and damage suffered by both the nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...inking pattern. If everyone would think in a similar way, there would not have been any individu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 943, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...en solved if the two nations would have came to some conlclusion through mutual disc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... opinions on the same performance, they dont necessarily discuss if their views matc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ne may like it, the other may not. This doesnt necessarily lead to conflicts and no mu...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...e decades. This has been a much violent issues in front of the nations. Several meetin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in fact, in general, kind of, talking about, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90509259259 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63188540277 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8777815836 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.722222222 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142129060587 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406567333368 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298601004275 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774097640784 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243788321163 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.