In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Progress can be defined as the path we always lead in life. In our childhood too, when we stood for the first time it was progress for us and then standing, walking,
running, playing games become the part of our life. But it is vital to note here that while walking for the first time we used to fell down a lot and that was how we learnt that walking might include falling too if we do not keep ourselves cautious. Falling is just like having a contrast point of view which is required for progress. Therefore, I stand in favor of the statement that 'In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting point of view'.
Initially, I would like to say that today's generation that lives in the age of the internet has the easy access towards the path of progress of people working in different industries. Most of the artists love to have the different point of view or constructive critisim is also appreciated. Such points help them to realise their own mistakes or let them scrutinize over the parts on which they would have never pondered on their own. Hence, contrasting points increase the progress of people.
Secondly, we can take an instance for a chemical industry. In the establishment of their organization the CEO would require chemical engineers and environmentalists too so that they can sit on the same desk and discuss how the company would consider the adulteration of the water by the waste. There could be different factors involved where people with distinct mindset are required to help a person or organization grow.
Thirdly, I would say that for a person to follow the path of progress they might have to think out of the box. Due to peculiar thinking today we have three laws of physics that were given by the Sir Issac Newton. Such thinking was also devised by the Kepler. He was the astrologer who suggested that Earth revolves around the Sun and not vice versa. But this discovery of his cost his life.
Lastly, I would like to end my note by concluding that even though for progress contrasting point of view is needed but it should not deflect us from the path of progress.
It should us lead to success and by any means should not have a negative impact on our physical or mental health. As contrasting points of view are not handled by
everyone but in certain situations, these are highly needed as these can act as a premonition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gress for us and then standing, walking, running, playing games become the part o...
^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he first time we used to fell down a lot and that was how we learnt that walking ...
^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
... Initially, I would like to say that todays generation that lives in the age of the...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asting points of view are not handled by everyone but in certain situations, thes...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66352941176 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59635091278 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510588235294 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5856444289 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367494909976 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115348948586 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152801098376 0.0758088955206 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15041167627 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116787767042 0.0667264976115 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.