In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Our Perspectives make us who we are! Perspective can be learned, unlearn and relearned. A lot of thing is a crucial determinant of how we think or see things (our point of view). When a group of individuals succeed at what they do, the cause of the success can partly be attached to the perspective of each individuals. I strongly agree that Discussion is patent for any Group that succeed on the expense of individual Perspective. My view is supported by the 2 reasons below Explained below:
Discussion give room for individuals to share their point of view and consider each person suggestion, by evaluating its benefits and loss. An example of these is the meeting leaders of nation have together in order to make better their Nation. When such meetings occur each point of view is being scrutinized. This in the long run will lead to progress of the nation.
It is so horrible how contrasting point of view can lead to disagreement between individual and put at stake or impede the project at hand. Such occurrence is what lead to the Second world War when a certain part of the world feel or see themselves as the ought-to-be leader of the whole world, but after a while, some countries came to a resolution and fine tune what is the root cause of the disagreement then the progress was the new perspective birthed as a result of the meeting, The saw a new point of view that it is when we stand together we can make the world better.
In conclusion, some may say discussion is not required for progress amidst people with contrasting ideas. They may preach their standpoint by giving an example of how an architect does not conform totally with an engineer on site and still the building construction get completed. But if discussion has not been an integral part of construction it wouldn’t have been part of the construction timeline schedule.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of things'.
Suggestion: A lot of things
... can be learned, unlearn and relearned. A lot of thing is a crucial determinant of how we thin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r in order to make better their Nation. When such meetings occur each point of view ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e ought-to-be leader of the whole world, but after a while, some countries came t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, so, still, then, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70552147239 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82925868932 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.9104445609 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156261549204 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627080678373 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597556291612 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930687815102 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267146857439 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.