art work must have meaning which most people can understand
The statement states that art work must have meaning which most people can understand in order to have high quality and a great value. As if the people cannot understand the hidden meaning of the art, then it failed in consider very important part in any valuable work. Personally, I disagree with this statement because the merit of the art defined by many standards other than being understandable by ordinary people, I feel this way for many reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First, The value of the art determined by how different this art is than any other work and the deep meaning of that art, so even if the art was not understandable by most people and was different in many ways than any other art and also has very deep thoughtful meaning, it would still has great value. For example, many arts through the history were underestimated in their time because the people could not understand their meaning, but after a small period of time with more educated people started to analyze the old art, that art became famous and more people start to consider it as valuable art.
Second, a lot of arts with great value are not understandable for most people because their meaning depends on specific culture or a certain event in the history which is not well-known for most people. For instance, Abo Alalaa who is unknown poet made a lot of poems with great value about Hebron city, those poems were not understandable for most of the people who did not live or visit the city, and because in his poems he always talked about how the people built the city and he also talked about the city’s traditions.
Of course, some people argue that if the art is not understandable then few people would consider watch or listen to it. However, the value of the art is not determined by the number of people who see it, but with the content of that art.
In summary, I strongly disagree that art work must be understandable by most people in order to have a great value. As the value of the art is determined by the deep meaning of the art, and how this art is different than any other work in the business. Furthermore, many arts are not understandable because they belong to specific culture which is known to few people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...deep thoughtful meaning, it would still has great value. For example, many arts thr...
^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rstand their meaning, but after a small period of time with more educated people started to an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 217, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... the art, and how this art is different than any other work in the business. Further...
^^^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...long to specific culture which is known to few people.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, still, then, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in summary, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60297766749 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53383048066 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394540942928 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.1099797048 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.583333333 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5833333333 23.4991977007 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 5.21951772744 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518651234269 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.247564458931 0.0831039109588 298% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154950273725 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339309810825 0.150359130593 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130933265775 0.0667264976115 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.