To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral
standards.
Highest Ethics and Moral standards though not mandatory are the salient values an effective leader is purported to have. Ethics and moral standards is what keeps a person grounded and loyal to the job and duty he or she needs to serve in order to contribute the society from a position of maintaining a public office. I think that ethics and moral standards should be the driving features of a effective leaders and public officials. My cerebrations for the same are broached in the following three paragraphs.
Firstly, a strong sense of ethical and moral values keeps a person from indulging into fradulent as well as licentious activities. For example a study conducted in India on the members of the parliament delineates that more than half the members of the parliament have been engaged in activities that can be deemed morally ethical and some have been reported to be involved in cases as pernicious as meddling with public welfare systems. One of these members was reported to have been overseeing and condoning a healthcare scam which directly effected the lives of hundreds of people. These people who are elected by the people to be leaders and champion human rights and healthcare for the people who elected them, when forgo ethics and moral standards for personal gains results to dire consequences as stated above.
Secondly, upholding the ethical standards and moral values as a leader helps to gain and maintain the trust with the people who the leaders represent. This helps in establishing a suitable and healthy atmosphere for the leader to work and people are less chary of them. For example, upcoming youth leaders like Chandrashekhar Azad of political organization representing minority earned overwhelming trust and support from the thousands of people he was surrounded by when he upholded the laws of the constituition while protesting against the authoritarian government and did not resort to violence even when provoked by the police. This limned to the people that instead of the constant efforts by the police to elicit a violent reaction, Chandrashekar refrained from being an incendiary and set a precedent to the crowds present there that day. His commitment to his words and moral standards made people have faith in him as a leader and this faith burgeoned across the crowd.
Lastly, a leader or a public official who venerates ethical and moral standards, inspires the next generation of leaders and also the people they represent, to do the same. From the example stated in the previous paragraph it can be showed that when a leader chooses to adopt the righteous way which is concomitant with ethics and good morals, it inspires peoples who surround this person to follow suit. It sets example for upcoming leaders as, how a leader should be. An example of Senator John McCain can be provided where he always refrained from calumnious speech against his political opponents and always lauded the competence of his opponents. His supporters who now venerate his ethical and moral values are the next generation of people who are carrying on his legacy after he died.
Thus, in conclusion, though one might argue that it is always not possible to maintain highest ethical and moral standards as an effective leader or public official, it is an indispensable fact that those who do maintain, are revered and become examples for the next generation of leaders to look up to. Thus, I firmly believe an effective leader, or an public official should always maintain highest of ethical and moral standards.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-21 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
2023-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
2023-07-06 | anupad1 | 50 | view |
2022-12-04 | swlee98 | 66 | view |
2022-11-10 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from a dean at Omega University Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors 58
- The most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little 66
- In any given field the leading voices come from people who are motivated not by conviction but by the desire to present opinions and ideas that differ from those held by the majority 66
- Unfortunately the media tend to highlight what is sensational at the moment Society would be better served if the media reported or focused more fully on events and trends that will ultimately have the most long term significance 66
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless they in fact prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Highest'.
Suggestion: The Highest
Highest Ethics and Moral standards though not m...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...dards should be the driving features of a effective leaders and public officials....
^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'maintain the highest'.
Suggestion: maintain the highest
...argue that it is always not possible to maintain highest ethical and moral standards as an effec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... firmly believe an effective leader, or an public official should always maintain ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2956.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 588.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02721088435 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9242980521 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73173935908 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457482993197 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 917.1 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.7141447192 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.8 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46286983606 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169240526521 0.0831039109588 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14875341084 0.0758088955206 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318397074567 0.150359130593 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154395881253 0.0667264976115 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.