Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
With the advent of online "blogosphere" political discourse has experienced a severe downfall. Firstly with the increase of content on the online platforms the attention span of a regular human being has decreased drastically, which results to people looking for less-time consuming alternatives for any desultory aspect of their daily life. The online blogosphere thus helps people in getting a less-time consuming source of information than going through a regular news broadcast. The blogosphere is purportedly a less-time consuming alternative to news broadcast and their news coverage.
The problem that it engenders is that though the less-time consuming blogosphere may seem to be a better alternative to actually tuning in for a daily news broadcast but regular people fail to judge the authenticity of the blogs they come across online. The authenticity and relevance of any article is of paramount importance if something is to be derived from it that would directly and indirectly affect any individual. With the paucity of fact checking organizations and uprising of the blogosphere the amount of fake news transmission can be compared to an epidemic.When political discourse is concerned the authenticity and the relevance of any article if found to be poor but in circulation among the general public, the misinformation that spreads after, might lead to resentment in public sentiments in particular communities or collectives. Such incidents can result to unnecessary violence and uproar.
As more and more people express their opinions, which may or may not be biased, the risk of getting attacked violently due to individual intolerances are increasing. In recent times in the United States, more cases of hate crimes and racial crimes are being reported and the roots of those crimes in most cases lie in the false narratives that were presented in some online article on the internet. Expressing opinions but at the same time not agreeing to disagree is one of the sole reasons for violence and diatribes across the blogosphere.
Though blogosphere does have advantages of fast and local reporting along with detailed analysis of political happenings, by individuals and groups they are rendered useless if they are not fact checked and relevant. Thus it undermines the reporting and news coverage done by news agencies and the claims is based on the reasons stated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsuming source of information than going through a regular news broadcast. The bl...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s broadcast and their news coverage. The problem that it engenders is that thoug...
^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y of the blogs they come across online. The authenticity and relevance of any artic...
^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
...smission can be compared to an epidemic.When political discourse is concerned the au...
^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...to be poor but in circulation among the general public, the misinformation that spreads after,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...they are not fact checked and relevant. Thus it undermines the reporting and news co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, so, then, thus, in particular, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15557791184 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521164021164 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.6405868049 60.3974514979 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.153846154 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0769230769 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180122769511 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663428750708 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461196770211 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106890073118 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349660212241 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.