The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Passionate interest can be defined as the involvement of the people in the subjects in which they have interest in. Generally, it has been found that such type of passion is arose from unremarkable things. 'Necessity is the mother of invention' became the famous quote only because of the fact that when human is in need of something then he/she might do research in the particular field due to its demand. Therefore, I almost agree to the statement that the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Initially, to support the issue it is quite essential to mention the transportation sector. It was human who was in need to reach the places as fast as he can therefore he started using animals as the source. But later, it was realised that transportation can be proliferated to next level when tire was invented. Such inclination towards the simple thing as transportation has today led human to reach even distinct terrestrial bodies of the universe.
Secondly, a lot of start-ups, now successful companies gained popularity because people realized there is a need to address such issues and this can be used to make our lives easier. Companies like PayPal, uber, ola, zomato, amazon reached the such heights of success only because they had the capability to turn upside down the ordinary life of a person. There would not be one thing a person might not able to do without stepping their foot outside their home. Even in time of coronavirus where every one was quarantined, work from home became the new normal of the twenty-first century. Hence, it proves that passionate interest can lead humans to do anything.
Thirdly, it would be wrong to say that only interest in ordinary things can lead to the best ideas. The main reason for this is that most of the inventions in science were because of the inclination towards exquisite things. For instance, Madam Curie worked upon one of the rarest elements of the earth Uranium, which is also radioactive. If she had not worked on it then we would not be aware of its pros and cons. Some of the inventions were mere accidents but in the end they lead to one of the best ideas that are even used today such as microwave, byoyancy principle, and so on.
Lastly, it might be prominent that best ideas are generated when ordinary things are scrutinized but it might not stand true for all. Therefore, it would not be wrong to agree to the issue but it is not true for every best idea discovered till now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...been found that such type of passion is arose from unremarkable things. Necessity is ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... invention became the famous quote only because of the fact that when human is in need of something then...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 417, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ould not be aware of its pros and cons. Some of the inventions were mere accidents but in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, as to, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73732718894 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63399431566 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3243154468 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.8 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140647521537 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500402888824 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628636237365 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870664574697 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582220374536 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.