The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
One’s thinking is conditioned by the things, events he/she sees, feels, hears, senses and understands. These things could be everyday things or interests that are deeply nuanced and niche. I think our everyday interactions and the musing we thus have generate the best ideas.
Necessity is the mother of all inventions, they say. Human ingenuity separates us from all other living species on the planet. The ancient man grew tired of walking everday, he invented the wheel. Our pedessors feared for life, started staying together and thus were born societies. These ideas were born out of regular, mundane, everyday events.
To some these rountine events become questions of philosophical thought. Deliberating of questions like how do society and man relate with with other led Rousseau to the ideas of social contract and democracy. One can doesnt have to go very far in time in order to dig out evidences these evidence. Pondering over questions about how time works led a patent officer to discover the theories of relativity. These ideas formed the basis of quantum physics. These theories today have been validated after the sighting of a black hole. What a feat for us humans!
This is one example where the patent distinction between commonplace inspirations and highly niche researched highly is observed. Quantum physics may have started with a child-like question but the processes to find these answers were methodical and were backed by keen and systematic enquiry. Another example of such enquiry is that Nobel prize winning theories on behavioural economics by Daniel Khaneman and Amos Tversky. They had the intial ideas during their walks and talks together, which were only later developed. The inspiration for all the ideas was indeed commonplace.
It can be argued that the illustrations above may seems to suggest that in order to come to frutition commonplace inspirations will always need academic backing. But it is not so. The fine art, literature, architecture are all full of examples of inspirations that are commonplace. Be it VanGogh sunflowers that he drew ebveryday or Jane Austen’
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erstands. These things could be everyday things or interests that are deeply nuan...
^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'generated'.
Suggestion: generated
...nteractions and the musing we thus have generate the best ideas. Necessity is the mo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
...ions like how do society and man relate with with other led Rousseau to the ideas of soci...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... social contract and democracy. One can doesnt have to go very far in time in order to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, thus, as for, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26099706745 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78631576189 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621700879765 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1090458708 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8260869565 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.69565217391 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0722629811825 0.243740707755 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0186609008828 0.0831039109588 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0205421675597 0.0758088955206 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0368095973504 0.150359130593 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016235449784 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.