The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A leader should invariably be aware of the responses given by the people he leads. Not only this awareness helps him to understand the situation at hand better, but also provides him with a better sense of introspection. But being aware would not always mean that he should encourage about what is being suggested to him. In other words, depending on the situation, a leader should decide whether to encourage feedback, take them into consideration or disregard them.
First of all, feedback is a necessary thing required by a leader for self-assessment. For instance, a course instructor only after getting feedback from his students can identify shortcomings in his teaching style. Not only this, but by encouraging this feedback by students and making changes accordingly, he can make his ties with students stronger than before. Hence, he will advance himself into becoming one of the best leaders in his field.
Again, a leader will be considered amongst the best if he is able to fulfill not only the organizational goals, but also keep track on what his followers think. For example, for a team working on a rocket project if the leader stays unyielding on any particular design point, oblivious to the detrimental effects his design is going to face, only the feedback from his team members will help him improvise. This will lead the project to a success and automatically future teams will consider him as a good leader
But, on the contrary, always encouraging feedback from the followers may put the leader in a state of quandary. For example, the president of a country cannot keep a track of billions of responses, his people give him. Moreover, some people will always tend to drag the leader down by making some intentional and derogatory remarks about his performance, trying to invariably befuddle him and distracting him from his target. The logic applied can also be extended to various other problems. Under such cases, the leader should not encourage feedback from each and every one.
In conclusion, to become a better leader, feedback is necessary and will mostly prove beneficial. But the leader should finally consider only those feedback, which after his own analysis will prove beneficial towards the goal. Nonetheless, he should have a sense of how much of this feedback he should allow modifying the system or process. Only then, he would have more chances of success and will become a better leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 557, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
...ader should not encourage feedback from each and every one. In conclusion, to become a better l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this feedback' or 'those feedbacks'?
Suggestion: this feedback; those feedbacks
...the leader should finally consider only those feedback, which after his own analysis will prov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03209876543 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75186929858 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498765432099 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6014587401 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.263157895 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26315789474 5.21951772744 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146597137788 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055598651045 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313741482455 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908246549094 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140942144019 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.