Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Politicians play a primary role in shaping of any country or society. Politicians tend to have power but one should also keep in mind that with great power comes great responsibility.
In tough times, politicians should come together on common ground and agree with what is good for all even if this goes against their position. This will be necessary to solve the problem quickly rather than worsening it. For instance, after recent outbreak of epidemic, rather than following elusive ideals, it is expected from the country officials to come together to solve unprecedented problems related to the epidemic that have started showing up. Rather than arguing on disparate ideals, they should agree with the most feasible solution in hand. Only this will avoid wastage of time.
Again, pursuing common grounds have often led to better results. For instance, the UN assembly members always seem to have upper hand since they help each other more frequently as compared to the other countries which are not the part of it. In such scenarios, coming pursuing common grounds actually has resulted in better relationships which helps in individual growth in times of need.
But this does not mean that this should always hold true. It often times is seen how to warring politicians have different perspectives. For example, one politician focuses on developement of backward classes and hence idealizes to give reservations to these classes if he comes into power while the other one focuses more on equality stating that backward classes, if given reservations, would misuse their powers. Both have disparate views but coming on reasonable consensus seems difficult. In such scenario, based on the prevailing conditions of the people and place, a final decision will have to be made.
Hence depending on the prevailing situations, one must conclude whether politicians should pursue common grounds and reasonable consensus or pursue their elusive ideals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | GRACE_047 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | _ashmita.upadhyay_ | 66 | view |
| 2022-03-09 | sunshaowei | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | ksmehrab | 66 | view |
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reas 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 62
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 66
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...final decision will have to be made. Hence depending on the prevailing situations,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27564102564 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66413063582 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580128205128 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.5095680888 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.875 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215504631057 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695456001998 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552217582136 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12560379612 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561030628052 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.